Momma’s Sweet Potato: Mauricio Helps Dad Beat The Dementia Dragon
In a courtroom scene that felt more like a family drama than a legal mumble, Kyle Richards’ estranged husband Mauricio Umansky sat under oath to help his elderly dad, Eduardo, fight for a restraining order. Guess who’s the star? Mauricio, age 54, who read the law like it was his favorite recipe book.
What Went Down on May 5
- Speaker: Mauricio Umansky, the proud brother who loves summer barbecues and serious legal jargon.
- Topic: Eduardo’s battle against the memory‑slippery side of dementia.
- Outcome: The court took a deep breath, scribbled away, and the transcript is now a lantern shining through the fog.
Why This Looks Like a Family Mission
On the 1‑10‑24 megashift of legal drama, Mauricio’s sister, Sharon Benton Umansky, drafted a petition to protect their old man from a longtime partner, Simin Tabibnia. It’s a battle for the 81‑year‑old Eduardo’s well‑being, and the entire Umansky clan is pitching in.
Inside the Restrainer’s Goldfish‑Slide
Picture it: a courtroom, a half‑cookie pie, and a vinyl record of “Bring It On” blasting in the background. Mauricio had to answer questions faster than a barista making latte art—“Did you see the last episode of your favorite show?” Not quite. “Did Eduardo know he was still living in the same house?’” But hey, that’s the kind of stuff that keeps a family together.
Quick Take
- Momma, Eduardo, is fighting dementia, thanks to a curse‑breaking legal team.
- Safer shelters and protective orders are the ultimate recipe for comfort.
- Long‑term “partner” Simin Tabibnia is the villain, or at least the antagonist in this legal saga.
Hold on—The Agency’s Founder, Mauricio, Faces a Family‑Smack‑down
In a courtroom scene that could’ve triggered a reality‑TV episode, Estella Sneider, Mauricio’s mother, appeared to weigh in on a family feud. She told the judge that she’s the proud mother of Mauricio and the exclusive long‑term love of “Sharon” (yes, that’s Eduardo’s 30‑year‑married partner). No, she’s not a gossip columnist—she’s just an attentive parent banging her forehead against the polished floor.
What Mauricio? Figure It Out
During the hearing, Mauricio made a point to clarify that he’s not just a friendly guy in the house; he’s the CEO and founder of the real estate firm The Agency. Even Eduardo, the seasoned agent, is his junior (allowing him to brag a bit about the “boot camp” he’s survived at the office).
- Estella’s Up Front: She’s the “Mama of Mauricio,” “Sharon,” and Eduardo—A 30‑year marriage cornerstone.
- Mauricio’s Role: CEO/Founder of The Agency, the company where Eduardo cranks out deals.
- Key Drama: The allegations attached Mauricio’s father in a whispered media storm—creating a new plot twist in an already tangled saga.
Why Everyone’s Watching
It’s not every day you see a mix of high‑stakes real‑estate, family drama, and courtroom drama sealed under one roof. While the legal pages crackle with the official voice of the judge, this family’s love and business lessons are spilling into the public arena—just like a live, unedited reality show, the only thing we do not have is a confession booth (or a red carpet).
Behind the Scenes of a Real Estate Show‑down
At the Los Angeles Superior Court a quirky little story unfolded—one that had our ears perked and our eyebrows raising.
Meet Mauricio and his “Commission Crew”
Mr. Mauricio dropped a nugget of insider knowledge: real‑estate agents at his firm typically grab 80% of the sale price and the remaining slice goes straight to The Agency, a sort of corporate “tip jar.” Imagine a pizza pie—eight slices for you, one for the pizza crew.
The Family Ties & Time‑Gap Drama
He added that it’s been over 18 months since his dad closed his last home deal. That two‑and‑a‑half‑year gap turned the courtroom into a waiting room of suspense.
The Lawyer Fumble
When the magistrate asked Mauricio how much Eduardo earned in 2023 from The Agency, Simin’s lawyer gunbed a protest. “Nope, that’s off‑limits,” the lawyer exclaimed, likely because they’d heard that Eduardo’s cash flowed into a weird “composite” that offended Simin.
Why the Money Matters
Sharon’s attorney put the nail to the head, saying the question was crucial because Simin had claimed that the dollar bills Eduardo paid her were actually an off‑the‑top share of his commissions. In plain English: “You think this was a mortgage payment? No, this was a commission cocktail.”
In the end, what might have been a straightforward commission query turned into a courtroom drama full of family drama, financial puzzles, and a detective story about where the money really went.
Family Feud: The Calderón Cash Conundrum
What the Court Heard
Sharon’s attorney dropped a bombshell: Eduardo allegedly sent $124,000 in 2023 and $156,000 in 2024. They argue this stash is evidence of alleged financial abuse.
Simin’s Side of the Story
Simin, who once worked with Eduardo selling houses, told the judge that the money was actually commissions owed to her. She’s got a track record, and those numbers lined up with her work.
Eduardo’s Earnings
- In 2023, Eduardo’s commissions were reported around $35,000.
- In 2024, a tax form revealed he earned $39,823.69.
Mauricio’s Take
Mauricio pointed out that Simin used to work for The Agency—the implication being she left in early 2024. The timeline may be a bit fuzzy, but it adds another layer to this family drama.
Bottom Line
Who’s getting what? Who’s really earning? And can a family feud ever settle itself with paperwork? The court is on the track, and the math is as sticky as a summer jam session.
LA Superior Court Drama: Mauricio vs. The Agency
The Dinner Table Talk
In a courtroom that felt more like a gossip club than a legal space, Simin’s lawyer fired a barrage of questions about the mysterious link between Eduardo and Simin. Mauricio, playing the straight man, clarified the family ties at play.
The Family Team
- Mauricio’s daughter was the big cheese as president of The Umansky Team, a unit inside The Agency.
- Both Eduardo and Mauricio fell into that team’s orbit, joining the mix.
- “Simin solo flew the flag,” Mauricio explained, “but she never actually dived into the commission pool.”
Courtesy Permits
It turns out Simin earned a courtesy title – a fancy label that came with no paycheck or ‘the real deal’ commissions. Think of it as a party favor email that never turned into a lottery ticket.
4% Stakes
- Eduardo owns four percent of The Agency, a slice of the pie if you will.
- Questions burst from Simin’s side: “Is he getting dividends for his slice?”
- Mauricio’s reply? “Nope, no cash payouts. The Agency has been taking a slow‑motion stroll through a sluggish real‑estate market.”
The Verdict?
There’s no dramatic twist yet, but this case keeps us guessing about who’s really pulling the strings in the real estate jungle.
Inside the Corporate Drama of a Los Angeles S‑Court Case
Ever wondered how a couple of business pals can turn a real‑estate fiasco into a courtroom headline? Let’s unpack the story with a dash of humor and a sprinkle of heart.
The Investment That Went in the Wrong Direction
- Eduardo put his money into The Agency at the start of a massive housing slump.
- In the last three years (2022‑2023), the brokerage hit the lowest transaction volume in the market since the 1990s.
- Those lean years left the company “losing a significant amount of money.”
Right‑Sizing in 2024 – A Business Make‑over
- By 2024, The Agency had trimmed its operations and hit a breakeven point.
- Thanks to the pivot, the firm avoided paying out dividends that year.
- Mauricio clarified that dividends were only issued once to owners, and the rest of the profits were reinvested into growth.
Mauricio, Eduardo, and the Hidden Income Mystery
Mauricio shares he was “close” with Eduardo’s dad, but claims no extra money flew into Eduardo’s pockets.
During the trial, the prosecutor poked Mauricio about a text he sent to Simin’s son on November 24, 2024. Mauricio’s reply was a bit theatrical:
“I don’t recall. I think that message kind of speaks for itself as to why I sent it. My dad was dealing with dementia, or maybe that’s my mom’s situation, so I was asking him to just, please stop.”
The text was something along these lines:
- “Regarding your mom and my father, I want to remind you and her that she cannot be speaking to my father.”
18 Years of Peace with Simin
Despite the recent mess, Mauricio swears he never had any trouble with Simin over the past 18 years she was involved with his father.
So there you have it—an unexpected courtroom tale of real‑estate downturns, familial whispers, and the thin line between business decision and personal drama. The courtroom may be a serious place, but the human stories inside it are anything but silent.
A Los Angeles Court Folds Over Simin’s “No Assholes” Clause
In front of a crowded Superior Court, Mauricio—yes, that famous real‑estate mogul—kicked off a saga that felt more like a courtroom drama than a corporate trade‑show.
The “No Assholes” Rule
Mauricio explained that the reason Simin was no longer part of The Agency was a breech of “rule number one.” When the judge asked for clarification, he rolled with an inside joke: “No assholes.”
In plain terms, Mauricio said: We just can’t tolerate anyone who throws a fit, lies about our values, or pads our brand with bad vibes.
Three Shocking Incidents
- First, Simin allegedly shouted at office staff in a way that had “my father” (blame for a quick nickname) calling them names. A crowd of employees reported the verbal onslaught.
- Second, the second twist—Simin’s boss received a live video of Simin yelling in public. The clip, shared on Twitter and TikTok, showed him berating a passerby for their political stance. To make things extra sticky, his car stamp read The Agency, and he’d plastered the brand on his LinkedIn bio.
- Third, the cumulative drama forced a break-up. The court heard stories of phone calls, open letters, and – crucially – social‑media backlash that pushed The Agency to sever ties.
The “Threats and Abuse” Story
Sharon, Mauricio’s sister, in her petition, spliced in a decade‑long clue of trouble. “I started noticing doubts about Simin’s behavior about ten years ago, but the real fire began in August or September of 2022” she admitted. “It was hard to call it out. The swarm of aggression just escalated from whispers to full‑filled convulsions.”
What’s Next?
As the court leaned back, the judge’s gavel seemed to echo that the “no assholes” rule isn’t just a slogan—it’s a survival tactic for a firm that refuses to let poor ethics run the show.
When Family Ties Turn into a Moral Dilemma
Picture this: a family where the older generation faces a sudden wave of aggression, and the younger side decides it’s time to chime in. Here’s the story that’s been whispered around the dinner table, with a dash of absurdity and a lot of emotional heft.
The Unfolding Crisis
- A dad, who had always been the “strong” figure, starts showing up with bloody arms and bruises—all thanks to an unknown source of pain.
- His daughter, Sharon, feels the urgency to step forward. She’s not just a spectator; she’s actively looking out for the man she loves.
- Sharon’s narrative—framed in private letters and frantic phone calls—reveals something far more sinister than accidental injuries: targeted abuse, physical violence, and even sexual manipulation.
- She claims her father was threatened with a jail sentence, much to the point that he’s rendered fearful of his own safety.
- Despite file(s) filed with the police, the father decided not to press charges, citing decades of intimidation from someone called “Simin”.
- Compounding the dilemma is the looming challenge of dementia: mental fog making it harder for the dad to clearly see what’s happening.
Why Nobody Pushed Harder?
The core of the struggle lies in trust and fear. When one’s mind starts slipping, you can’t afford to lose them. Sharon says that if he were to confront the situation openly, he might do more harm to his own emotional well-being. Hence the careful balance between legal step and gentle support.
The Moral Stakes
- Shielding a loved one from an emotionally charged threat that might reshape their life.
- Navigating legal avenues while respecting the dignity of someone who may not fully grasp the consequences.
- Finding a path that protects the father, the mother, and the entire family’s sanity.
Turning the Page Together
Sharon’s decision to intervene shows the very real complexity of caring for aging relatives. It’s a test of empathy, bravery, and the willingness to stand up for those too protected by their fears. The story underscores how ordinary folks must become extraordinary allies when the stakes stretch beyond the ordinary.
Quick Takeaway
- When an elderly loved one faces unknown abuse, the family can’t just let it slide.
- Legal action is one limit; emotional compassion is another.
- —And life demands both courage and a reservoir of patience.
Kyle Richards’ Ex’s Family Reveal Bombshell Videos in Court Battle
Simin throws a brutal rebuttal: She has barked back at the allegations like a cat that keeps the vet away. The woman says she’s been dragged through a circus of abuse for the past 18 years, and that Eduardo is the real villain.
What Simin says in her filing
- She’s not just a victim; she’s an anti‑hero in her own story.
- All the drama? It’s all painted by her ex’s mischievous past.
- “Sharon’s claims that I am physically abusive? Totally false,” she wrote. She adds an irony twist: she has endured a lot of violent physical abuse from Eduardo.
- She file for a restraining order because, let’s be honest, no one needs a binge‑watching ex that’s cracked in the middle of the night.
Key Takeaway:
It’s a real courtroom epic – Simin stands tall, while her ex’s family pulls back the curtain with a rude video surprise. The only thing left to decide is who has the stronger court dedication.
Mauricio Umansky’s Family Chaos Degenerates into a Restraining Order Showdown
The Basic Storyline
When Simin, the daughter, stepped onto the defense, the picture that emerged was far from innocent. She’s filing a damning petition that includes photographic evidence of what she claims are bruises inflicted by her dad, Eduardo.
Key Claims
- Photo Proof: Simin’s evidence shows alleged bruises that she attributes to Eduardo’s violent actions.
- Peace‑and‑Safety Request: She’s demanding that the court issue a restraining order keeping Eduardo at a safe distance and forbidding any direct contact.
- Abuse Narrative: Simin describes a long‑term pattern of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse, citing specific incidents such as punches to the face and arms, shoving her to the floor, and choking.
- Emotional Fallout: She claims that these ordeals have left her both physically and emotionally scarred.
- Trigger Factors: Simin suggests Eduardo’s violent outbursts are linked to alcohol consumption and family confrontations.
Current Legal Stand‑point
The legal proceedings are still in motion. Whether the court sides with Simin or Eduardo remains to be decided—watch this space for updates.