Tag: Connecticut

  • Attorneys general warn OpenAI ‘harm to children will not be tolerated’

    Attorneys general warn OpenAI ‘harm to children will not be tolerated’

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings met with and sent an open letter to OpenAI to express their concerns over the safety of ChatGPT, particularly for children and teens. 

    The warning comes a week after Bonta and 44 other attorneys general sent a letter to 12 of the top AI companies, following reports of sexually inappropriate interactions between AI chatbots and children. 

    “Since the issuance of that letter, we learned of the heartbreaking death by suicide of one young Californian after he had prolonged interactions with an OpenAI chatbot, as well as a similarly disturbing murder-suicide in Connecticut,” Bonta and Jennings write. “Whatever safeguards were in place did not work.”

    The two state officials are currently investigating OpenAI’s proposed restructuring into a for-profit entity to ensure that the mission of the nonprofit remains intact. That mission “includes ensuring that artificial intelligence is deployed safely” and building artificial general intelligence (AGI) to benefit all humanity, “including children,” per the letter. 

    “Before we get to benefiting, we need to ensure that adequate safety measures are in place to not harm,” the letter continues. “It is our shared view that OpenAI and the industry at large are not where they need to be in ensuring safety in AI products’ development and deployment. As Attorneys General, public safety is one of our core missions. As we continue our dialogue related to OpenAI’s recapitalization plan, we must work to accelerate and amplify safety as a governing force in the future of this powerful technology.”

    Bonta and Jennings have asked for more information about OpenAI’s current safety precautions and governance, and said they expect the company to take immediate remedial measures where appropriate.

    Bret Taylor, chair of the OpenAI board, said in a statement that the company is committed to addressing the attorneys general’s concerns.

    Techcrunch event

    Join 10k+ tech and VC leaders for growth and connections at Disrupt 2025

    Netflix, Box, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just some of the 250+ heavy hitters leading 200+ sessions designed to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech. Grab your ticket before Sept 26 to save up to $668.

    Join 10k+ tech and VC leaders for growth and connections at Disrupt 2025

    Netflix, Box, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just some of the 250+ heavy hitters leading 200+ sessions designed to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech. Grab your ticket before Sept 26 to save up to $668.

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    REGISTER NOW

    “We are heartbroken by these tragedies and our deepest sympathies are with the families,” Taylor said. “Safety is our highest priority and we’re working closely with policymakers around the world.”

    OpenAI has said it’s working to expand protections for teens with parental controls and the ability for parents to be notified when their child is in a moment of acute distress.

    This article has been updated with a comment from OpenAI.

  • Judge Lists Infowars for Sale Again as Leftists Call for Alex Jones Takedown

    Judge Lists Infowars for Sale Again as Leftists Call for Alex Jones Takedown

    What’s Really Happening With the Sandy Hook Lawsuit?

    The so‑called “justice” rallying cry from many mainstream outlets is a bit of a smokescreen.
    When you look at what the plaintiffs have actually done, it’s clear they’re steering this trial into a political arena – not merely a quest to output compensation for any alleged suffering caused by Alex Jones’ outlandish tweets about the tragedy.

    Why the Big Numbers Don’t Line Up With Reality

    • Legal vs. “Logical” Payments: If the suit was truly about reparations for bad‑mouth damage, the court would have calculated a payout that Jones could feasibly pay.
    • Stone‑Cold $1.5 billion: Instead, judges handed a slammed figure to 15 plaintiffs, as if the goal was to topple Alex Jones outright.
    • Political Motive: The staggering award reads more like an attempt to silence one voice than a reasonable solution for hurt people.

    What’s at Stake?

    Picture this: a courtroom drama that feels more like a chapter from a political thriller than a civil dispute. The defendants—Alex Jones and his Free Speech Systems—have been dragged into a spectacle that’s less about debt and more about a show‑stopper blow to free expression. The outcome doesn’t just raise questions about restitution; it flips over the entire debate on whether the court is still about justice or about throwing out a stubborn opponent.

    In Short…

    Claims that the suit is purely a healing gesture for grieving parents fall short when you realize the payouts have less to do with “compensation for damage” and more with a bold, politically‑charged bid to keep a controversial figure out of the spotlight forever.

    Alex Jones, The Onion, and the Wild Ride of a Bankrupt Dream

    Picture this: a Connecticut bankruptcy judge calls out Alex Jones for “willful and malicious” lies about the Sandy Hook tragedy. That’s The Judge’s verdict. The consequence? Jones can’t wipe those debts clean with a simple bankruptcy filing. Instead, he may have to keep paying out his future income until the families finally get their money.

    Why the Left Is On a Mission Art

    • The left sees Jones as a target: the noble goal? To turn him into a lifelong pauper or even a “slave” to prove a point in the alt‑media world.
    • They want the auction to hand his famous Infowars assets to a leftist humor outlet called The Onion, treating his wallet like a bank account with a “contingency bid.”

    The Auction Action

    • The Onion offered a hefty $7 million but no cash on hand; they tried to borrow money from Jones’s future payouts.
    • First United American Companies came in with $3.5 million for a nutritional supplement site bearing Jones’s name.
    • Despite the numbers, The Onion still won—until Judge Christopher Lopez intervened, calling the process “flawed” and saying it left “a lot of money on the table.”

    Enter Texas Judge Maya Guerra Gamble

    Just when everyone thought the drama was over, a new Texas ruling flipped everything again: free speech fan site Free Speech Systems will be put under court‑appointed receivership. Those hands will sell assets and funnel the proceeds straight into Jones’s debt to the Sandy Hook families.

    What the Media Is Saying

    • Progressive outlets are buzzing with the idea that The Onion could take the brand and turn it into a parody—if they’ve got the cash and comic chops, which—let’s be honest—The Onion is more about satire than slap‑stick.
    • They’re hoping the Infowars fan club will crumble in a grand “victory” moment. But, spoiler alert: even if it works, the war for ideology has already shifted. Alex Jones has already carved a niche and brought the whole “woke” debate into the spotlight.

    The Bottom Line

    Most folks see this as less about justice and more about a tactical haircut for a political minority afraid of losing their voice. It’s a tangled, comedic circus—so buckle up. No code, no locks, just a dramatic bankruptcy showdown that refuses to end.