Tag: context

  • Trump, Netanyahu: War Heroes?

    Trump, Netanyahu: War Heroes?

    Should they be getting military medals pinned on them? …Not quite (imagined ‘battlefields’ and self-delusions notwithstanding), but President Trump in an interview which aired Tuesday with Mark Levin hailed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a “war hero” for ordering his military to launch a surprise attack on Iran in June.

    Trump then quickly followed by saying that the same label should apply to himself. He had started in the interview by calling Netanyahu a “good man” – echoing the chummy atmosphere of self-congratulations on display when the two leaders met at the White House in July, following the 12-day war which by the end saw the US military hit three key Iranian nuclear sites, upon orders from the Commander-in-Chief.

    “He’s a war hero, because we work together. He’s a war hero,” Trump said of ‘Bibi’… “I guess I am too,” he added. Show host Levin can be heard quickly chiming in with a “yup” – apparently in full agreement. Listen to the brief exchange below:

    Trump had elsewhere in the interview proclaimed, “I’ve settled six wars, and we did Iran, and I wiped out their total nuclear capability, which they would have used against Israel in two seconds if they had the chance.”

    But this of course ignores the fact that a significant chunk of Trump’s base was outraged over the new and brazen US military adventurism targeting Iran – given he had long campaigned on not starting new wars in the Middle East, and Iran has not attacked the United States. Also, Trump has lately in effect given a greenlight for Israel to obliterate and decimate Gaza and the hundreds of thousands of civilians therein. More like war criminals, perhaps.

    Trump himself has of course never served in the military. One prior report observes that “Donald Trump avoided the military draft 5 times, but it wasn’t uncommon for young men from influential families to do so during the Vietnam War.”

    An additional irony is that all of this was said on Mark Levin’s show – a pundit who for many years has presented on Fox News. In any other context whatsoever, Levin and his Fox neoconservative-leaning audience would rant and rage over ‘stolen valor’… but of course this is Trump we’re talking about, and so there’s barely a whimper out of the mainstream Right – he gets a permanent pass, apparently.

    To be fair, this is nothing new for the upper echelons of the political elite class. Remember last-action-hero Hillary Clinton claiming to have come under ‘sniper fire’ during a 90s visit to Bosnia?

    I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base,” she said at the time. And then later:

    Hillary Clinton has been forced to admit she exaggerated claims of coming under sniper fire during a visit to Bosnia in the 1990s after video footage showed the then first lady walking calmly from her plane.

    …The row centers on a comment she made during a campaign stop in Washington DC last week. Keen to talk up her experience, she spoke vividly about a harrowing and dangerous trip she made in March 1996 to Tuzla airport, in Bosnia.

    We could also bring up Senator Richard Blumenthal to further illustrate the propensity for the political class, who make decisions to initiate acts of war on faraway foreign lands from posh air-conditioned offices and their hand-stitched leather chairs, to envision themselves as ‘heroes’ and as ‘courageous’. From 2018 false claims about having “served in Vietnam”

    Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said he had “misspoken” about his service in the Vietnam War. His admission came after The New York Times obtained his Selective Service Record showing he received five draft deferments before joining the U.S. Marine Corps Reserves, according to a Snopes fact check.

    Trump’s latest comments about himself and Netanyahu, while absurd and laughable, sadly stand in a long tradition of American politics.

    Skin in the Game: Talk is Cheap

    All of this is illustrative of a decline and illusions of empire which was aptly articulated by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book Skin in the Game, and various accompanying essays:

    But what we call “empty suits”, of the kind you see in think tanks or large corporations – those who want to increasingly run our lives or intervene in Libya – look like actors playing the part, down to their vocabulary and the multiplicative meetings. Talk is cheap and people who talk and don’t do are easily detectable by the public because they are too good at talking.

    Taleb continues with an explanation which now could just as easily apply to Trump’s ‘surprise’ bombing of Iran this summer alongside Israeli jet raids – which killed many unsuspecting Iranian civilians – from the book [emphasis ZH]:

    Now some innocent people-Ezidis, Christian minorities in the Near (and Middle) East, Mandeans, Syrians, Iraqis, and Libyans – had to pay a price for the mistakes of these interventionistas currently sitting in comfortable air-conditioned offices. This, we will see, violates the very notion of justice from its prebiblical, Babylonian inception – as well as the ethical structure, that underlying matrix thanks to which humanity has survived. The principle of intervention, like that of healers, is first do no harm (primum non nocere); even more, we will argue, those who don’t take risks should never be involved in making decisions.

    Further, We have always been crazy but weren’t skilled enough to destroy the world. Now we can. We will return to the “peacemaking” interventionistas, and examine how their peace processes create deadlocks, as with the Israeli-Palestinian problem.

    Taleb further emphasizes, “This idea of skin in the game is woven into history: historically, all war- lords and warmongers were warriors themselves, and, with a few curi- ous exceptions, societies were run by risk takers, not risk transferors.” At this moment, Lindsey Graham is probably the absolute worst offender, simultaneously salivating over ramping up offensive actions against Russia, Gaza, and Iran. And then China (over Taiwan) will likely soon follow. 

    Loading recommendations…
  • WhatsApp Unveils Safeguards to Shield Users from Scams

    WhatsApp Arms Users Against Scammers

    WhatsApp just rolled out a toolkit to spot and stop scammy moves on its messaging platform. In addition, the company has already kicked out a whopping 6.8 million accounts tied to shady crime rings that target folks worldwide.

    What’s New?

    The fresh features are designed for both one‑to‑one chats and group conversations, giving you a safety net when unknown people try to pull you into the mix.

    Group‑Chat Safety Overview

    When someone who’s not on your contacts list drops you into a new group you’ve never seen before, WhatsApp will pop up a Safety Overview box. The little genius dashboard will show:

    • The identity of the person who joined you.
    • Which—or if any—members are actually in your contact list.
    • Quick tips to keep your data safe.

    Feeling like it’s a legit group? Click to peek at the whole chat for more context. Whichever route you take, notifications from the new group will be muted until you confirm you want to stay. No surprise spam alerts.

    Individual‑Chat Checks

    WhatsApp now also flags suspicious messages in one‑on‑one chats, alerting you if a sender looks like a known scammer. It’s a simple “hover‑over” warning before you hit inhale and send.

    All of this is part of the company’s bigger plan to keep the platform safe for everyone.

    Hang Tight—WhatsApp Has Your Back

    By removing millions of scam accounts and giving you smarter safety options, WhatsApp is giving a huge boost to your peace of mind—so you can keep chatting without the hunch that someone is after your money.

    WhatsApp’s New Scammer‑Busting Tricks

    Why Scammers Love a “New” Chat

    Scammers are the worst at pretending you’re in a secret chat, only to turn it into a full‑blown money‑grabber. They start on any platform you’re on—Facebook, Instagram, even that weird forum you’re lurking on—and then ask you to hop over to WhatsApp. Now, WhatsApp is playing detective before you even hit “send”.

    The “Who Do I Really Chat With?” Feature

    • When a stranger starts a message, WhatsApp shows you a little sidebar with extra info about who they could be.
    • Think of it as a “People Also Asked” pop‑up, but for avoiding scams.
    • It turns out you’ll know whether you’re talking to a genuine old friend or a slick phishing bot.

    Team‑Up With OpenAI to Shoot Down Scam Hive‑Minds

    WhatsApp teamed up with OpenAI’s GPT to stop a scam ring out of Cambodia. The hotline was a mess of fake promises and “pyramid” schemes.

    What They’re “Dooing”

    • Gives you fake “likes” for a cash payout.
    • Leads you into a rent‑a‑scooter pyramid—ethics, you say? Nope.
    • Pushes you into investing in a cryptocurrency that’s about as real as a unicorn.

    Here’s how the scammers played the drill:

    • Their first step? A slick ChatGPT‑generated typo‑free message with a link to WhatsApp.
    • Much like an elevator pitch, they quickly shift the conversation to Telegram.
    • Then they hand you a TikTok “like” assignment—yes, they pull the entire thing out of thin air.
    • They’ll brag about your “earned” balance, as if you’re about to be a Wall Street pro.
    • Finally, they prompt you to deposit money into an opaque crypto account.

    How to Stay Safe (Without Feeling Like a Puzzling Dot)

    Don’t rush. Pull back for a moment: does the task even make sense? If the person’s calling themselves a friend or kin, verify them with a call, a video chat, or an old-school text. One simple question can save you from becoming a bait for a scam.

    Bottom line: keep a friendly but skeptical mindset. If it seems fishy, it probably is, and you’ve got the right tools from WhatsApp to keep it from sinking.