Tag: deemed

  • Exclusive: Elon Musk’s X fails to deal with Russian disinformation, breaching EU rules, study says

    Exclusive: Elon Musk’s X fails to deal with Russian disinformation, breaching EU rules, study says

    Some 125 reports of Russian disinformation were reported to X, but only one was removed. The rest went largely ignored.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    More than 100 pieces of content published on X from Russian state media and disinformation actors that fail to comply with European rules still appear on the social media platform despite being reported to X, according to a new report.
    The report commissioned by pan-European non-profit group WeMove Europe, which was shared exclusively with Euronews, found “125 clear sanction-violating posts” on the Elon Musk-owned platform.

    Some of the posts included programmes from the Russian state broadcaster Russia Today (RT), which has been banned by the European Union since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. 
    In one instance, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs account on X shared an excerpt from a documentary produced by RT, which shared a false narrative about an Adolf Hitler collaborator who was “elevated to the rank of national hero by the Kyiv regime”. The post also provided a link to bypass sanctions and access the full film on Telegram.
    The researchers behind the paper had reported to X all the content deemed illegal under Europe’s Digital Services Act (DSA), the bloc’s digital transparency rules. The report found that only 57 per cent of the reports of illegal content received acknowledgement receipts, which breaches the DSA.
    Among the 125 reports, only one post was removed by X. The company said that there was no violation of EU law.

    Related

    Elon Musk’s X says French probe into algorithm is ‘politically motivated’

    In some cases, X responded to the researchers’ complaints within two minutes, the report said, suggesting that automation is playing a big role in X’s content moderation.
    The European Commission, the EU’s executive body, launched a formal investigation into X this year for breaching the DSA and said it would finalise the investigation before the summer recess, which begins on July 25.
    However, the Financial Times reported last week that the Commission will miss this deadline as it aims to conclude trade talks with the United States.
    Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told Euronews Next that it is continuing to investigate potential violations by X of the DSA’s illegal content rules.

    “The Commission is aware of these reports and is continuously assessing incoming information,” Regnier said.
    Earlier this month, the Commission told X it appeared to be in violation of other parts of the DSA, including “areas linked to dark patterns, advertising transparency and data access for researchers,” Regnier added.
    In January, French prosecutors also launched an investigation following allegations that X’s algorithm was being used for the purposes of foreign interference.
    The researchers filed the reports to X on July 8 and 9, 2025. While they were met with automatic replies in most cases that X would look into their complaints, in the majority of them, they did not hear back. 
    Euronews Next has also contacted X for comment about the report but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. 

    Russia’s online war

    Under the EU sanctions regime, it is prohibited to offer content hosting services for sanctioned entities, such as broadcasters or sanctioned individuals. 
    Russia has intensified its disinformation campaign in Europe since it invaded Ukraine in 2022, the researchers said.
    Along with official Russian government accounts spreading fake news, there were also accounts likely operated by the “Social Design Agency,” a Russian company known to produce Russia’s influence campaign “Operation Doppelgänger,” as well as anonymous users repeatedly posting such material.

    Related

    ‘Threat is ongoing’ as Russian Doppelganger operation continues on X and Meta despite EU probe

    “Overall, the volume indeed exploded [since the war]. It’s much more significant,” said Charles Terroille, a project and investigative research officer at the fact-checking group Science Feedback who worked on the paper. 
    “A lot of the posts that we flagged to X are for instance, documentaries, if you can call them that, so 40-minute videos hosted on X that are Russia Today showing, for example, how Ukraine deserved it all or how [President] Zelenskyy and all the government people and officials in Ukraine are just fans of Nazi figures and all these widely false and reported stories that Russia is propping,” he told Euronews Next.
    Terroille said another Russian method is to fabricate pages that look like well-known Western media outlets and spread them on X.
    He added that fake news about public health and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines are still running, among other topics, such as misinformation about the environment and are “absolutely weaponised” by Russia.
    For Taïme Smit Pellure, a digital campaigner at WeMove Europe who led the report, the most shocking part of the research was that the content is also translated into people’s home languages, such as French, and is “everywhere” on X.

    Related

    Does Ukraine’s first-in-Europe internet deal with Starlink mean more dependence on Elon Musk?

    She told Euronews Next that both the Commission and X should be acting faster and that her organisation has reached out to the Commission but it has not had a “positive response yet”.
    “We know they are working on this, we know they are, it’s not like they’re looking away completely, just taking their time because they want to do it right and we completely understand that,” she said.
    Another recommendation for the Commission is for European governments to work together in a more coordinated manner to address this issue, said Saman Nazari, lead researcher of civic campaign group Alliance4Europe, who also worked on the paper.
    “As long as we stay only working in our own little bubbles, we do not stand a chance against a multi-billion euro influence apparatus,” Nazari said.
    His recommendation for X is that “there is not that much nuance. It’s straight-up illegal content,” and that “it doesn’t take much time” to find such content and address it.
    “This is incredibly low-hanging fruit,” he added.
    Updated July 23: This story has been updated with comment from the European Commission.

  • Who\’s Been Targeting Democracy?

    Who\’s Been Targeting Democracy?

    When “Destroying Democracy” Becomes a Buzzword: A Satirical Take

    Have you noticed how the word “destroying democracy” pops up in conversations about redistricting, the Supreme Court, and everything in between? Let’s tease apart what some folks actually mean when they use it, and the wild hypotheticals that follow.

    Is the left only dreaming about tearing down constitutional relics?

    • Do they want to re‑shape a 156‑year‑old Supreme Court to suit short‑term politics?
    • Did they ever joke about snatching the filibuster because they barely hold a Senate majority?
    • What about the idea of turning Puerto Rico and D.C. into new states just to grab four extra liberal senators?
    • And, oh, let’s not forget the national popular vote scheme, preying on the 288‑year‑old Electoral College.

    Weaponizing the bureaucracy—fascinating!

    Picture a president turning federal agencies into partisan weapons. Who’s behind the metaphorical “CIA collusion” rumor that supposedly sabotaged a campaign? Who’s the mastermind behind the “51 former intel folks” that claimed a laptop scandal was a Russian plot? And then there’s the move to censor “unhelpful” news, all in under the guise of national security. Sounds almost too dramatic for a dinner conversation, right?

    The alleged “coup” and the saga of rogue presidential politics

    • The story of covert operatives running a seemingly “cognitively debilitated” presidency.
    • The so‑called cancellation of a reelection effort—just to hand the reins to a newcomer who never even ran a primary campaign.
    • The FBI SWAT invasion of a former president’s home over a stray file classification request.

    Political wrangle in the book

    Someone coordinated local, state and federal prosecutors to top‑coat a former president with unprecedented charges. Meanwhile, an entire justice division was shuffled to target the same figure, all happening two days after a “2024” announcement. Talk about a plot twist!

    Examination of “impeached twice” rhetoric

    Did any party ever try to impeach a president while you’re shining a spotlight on a detached office? Were presidential candidates ever murdered (or narrowly avoided murder) while being flanked by double aide‑on‑the‑side pre‑set? The balancing act seems more like a soap opera.

    Border chaos: the recipe for a national emergency (or comedic horror)

    • Breaking federal law by letting in 10–12 million people without background checks—who’re the folks orchestrating that?
    • The creation of 600 “sanctuary jurisdictions” that rival the infamous Confederacy in their defiance.
    • The riot and arson that caused a $2‑billion blow‑up, with 35 casualties, 1,500 officers injured, and a historic church left in tatters—no pun intended, no legal consequence.

    Why the so‑called “destroyers” linger in favour?

    It seems those deemed by some to be “destroying democracy” still garner 60–70 % approval on key issues, while the so‑called “saviors” win the popular vote in elections. A paradox, indeed.

    Closing thoughts? A tongue‑in‑cheek observation

    When a president claims to have “destroyed democracy” while secretly winning with electoral college and winning majorities across the board, the claim rings hollow—like a Broadway show where the audience fails to applaud the actual performance.

    So, what’s really going on with these bizarre charges? Maybe it’s less about an enemy inside the system and more about a misinterpretation of political zeal. But hey—if you’re seeking a good laugh on the politics of today, you’re in the right place!

    Three Reasons Why the Democrats Are in a Tight Spot

    1⃣ Middle‑class Chill‑out

    Think of the Democrats as that over‑dramatic family friend who keeps talking about sweeping changes while everyone else is just trying to get a coffee. The Jacobin‑style agenda has gummed the middle‑class crowd, and the result is a clean sweep: Congress, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court have all been given a verbal reality check. Now they’re left with zero “federal political power” to actually say something.

    2⃣ Polling Low, Allies High

    Polls are at record lows, yet the party stubbornly pushes the very groups that should keep it alive—minorities, the youth, and Independents. It’s like pouring water into a leaky bucket and still expecting the rain to bring sunshine.

    3⃣ No Massive Resonance, No Gold‑Standard Leaders

    Conversations around the table show that Democrats can’t find issues that people actually care about, nor leaders who can persuade folks that there’s a good reason for them to care. It’s politics without a hook—like a song without a chorus—you just can’t get people to stay tuned.

    So, it’s no surprise that the Democrats are barking at the shadows when they know their revolutionary, neo‑socialist agenda is already the chain that’s pulling them down. Like addicts who never give up on a destructive fix, they choose destruction over abandoning their own self‑destructive dependencies.