Oops! The Meteoric Meteorology Mission Goes Missing
Picture this: a sleek, high‑resolution space shuttle cruising the skies, sending back crisp images that help scientists keep an eye on our planet’s methane levels. Then—crash! A sudden power hiccup snuffs out its connection, and the satellite goes quiet, never to be seen again.
What Went Wrong?
- Power Failure: The satellite’s main battery ran out or a critical component failed.
- Communication Loss: Without power, no signals were sent back to Earth.
- Mission Gone Dark: All hopes of tracking global methane emissions from orbit evaporated.
Why It Matters
These satellites act like the world’s best detective, hunting down methane leaks—those pesky greenhouse gas culprits from livestock, pipelines, and festivals. Losing one means a piece of the puzzle that calculates our planet’s global carbon footprint just got a dark spot.
The Aftermath
NASA and its partners are already mobilizing backup satellites and ground‑based sensors. Imagine a fire‑fight-urge: “No panic, just a pivot.” They’ll dash to patch the data gaps and keep environmental monitoring humming.
In a Nutshell
While the loss is a setback, the mission’s spirit lives on. It’s a reminder that even in space, a simple power glitch can derail big‑picture plans—and that we’re always scrambling to bring a satellite back from the brink!

MethaneSAT: The Greenhouse Gas Spy That Said Goodbye
In a plot twist straight out of a space‑opera, the $88 million MethaneSAT satellite, the brainchild of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the generous backer Jeff Bezos, went silent just ten days ago.
What Happened?
On Friday, June 20, the mission lost all contact with the orbital weather‑watcher. Our crew at Mission Operations tried every trick in the toolbox – from brute‑force signal boosts to elaborate handshake routines – but the satellite slipped away.
After a frantic chase through the data, we learned this morning that MethaneSAT has lost all power and is unlikely to be saved. You can imagine the weight of the news, but seriously – it’s just one satellite north of Svalbard that faltered.
Not the End of The Story
- Success Ahead of Loss: When the mission launched last March, it delivered a trove of methane‑emission data that put global oil and gas giants under a very “name‑and‑shame” spotlight.
- Cutting‑Edge Tech: Built on Blue Canyon Technologies’ X‑Sat platform, it carried a custom infrared spectrometer from Ball Aerospace, sharp enough to sniff out methane plumes big and small.
- Legacy Lessons: As Amy Middleton, EDF’s senior vice president, explained, “We’re seeing this as a setback, not a failure. We’ve already learned so much because we dared to star‑burst into the unknown.”
Why It Still Brings Hope
Even though the satellite’s body has gone dark, the data it’s turned over will stay in the public domain and fuel future research. The mission was a bold step forward in science, technology and climate advocacy. When a satellite fails, scientists and activists re‑frame the narrative as a learning moment rather than a dashed dream.
Oil & Gas Companies, Take a Breath (but not too long)
Though the name‑and‑shame tool has taken a hiatus, counting your cattle isn’t all that easy without a shooter in space. But hey, at least the projection of the world’s methane churn will keep coming from the ground.
And as the U.S. debates its self‑imposed “de‑growth” policies, one can’t help but wonder: did MethaneSAT ever fine‑tune its cameras on China’s coal‑powered grid? That’s a mystery for a later‑season episode.
In the end, the loss of MethaneSAT reminds us that space missions are high‑risk, high‑reward endeavors. What matters is that we keep reaching for the stars, armed with the data and lessons each unlucky satellite teaches us.






