Tag: harm

  • Britain’s Daily 30 Arrests for Speech: A Shocking Reality

    Britain’s Daily 30 Arrests for Speech: A Shocking Reality

    Lord Toby Young & the Online Safety Act: A Wake‑Up Call for Free Speech

    In a rousing chat on Triggernometry, the sky‑scraper‑loving, podcast‑pushing Lord Toby Young turns the UK’s newest Online Safety Act into a lightning‑fast free‑speech debate.

    What’s the Buzz?

    The Online Safety Act is slated to give regulators a wide‑angle lens—think “big brother” meets “want‑to‑be‑protective.” It puts pressure on social platforms to police violent or illegal content, but the question is: where do we draw the fine line between safety and censorship?

    Lord Toby’s Take

    • “We’re riding a treadmill that’s always hitting the next stop,” says Young. “If we stop and breathe, we’ll hit a wall of either over‑censorship or, worse, a digital free‑fall.”
    • He scoops up a metaphor: It’s like handing a toddler a fancy knife and then asking them to keep the kitchen safe. Agreed, safety is vital, but protecting the toddler’s freedom to doodle is equally important.”
    • “We must establish real, transparent accountability,” he stresses, adding that tech giants know the policy details but not the user details—yet people still get silenced.

    Why the Free‑Speech Union Matters

    Toby’s Free Speech Union is on the front lines, demanding that the legislation uphold the spirit of free expression without turning an entire platform into a digital police station. He’s on a mission to turn the UK into a “public square” that doesn’t just silence dissent but invites debate.

    Humour Level: 9/10

    In the interview, Toby delivers witty jabs, like: “If Facebook doesn’t want us to write the post‑COVID bakery whether it’s real or fictional, then I’m getting a cake and a warning about fake recipes.” That kind of punch keeps the episode lively and relatable.

    Takeaway

    For Brits who believe in free speech, this conversation is a reminder that clarity, accountability, and transparency are the keys to keeping the internet a safe yet open playground. And with Lord Toby’s sharp wit, it’s as entertaining as it is enlightening.

    Lord Toby Young’s Take on the UK’s “Safety” Laws

    If you’re wondering why this UK law feels like a rubber stamp for Surveillance, Dobson, & the Ministry of Red Tape, dive into Lord Toby Young’s critique. He argues the Act started as a moral panic over kids stumbling onto auto‑harm sites and porn online, and it has ballooned into a fear‑filled fortress that gags not just the deviant but also the decent.

    Why the Act is a “Safety”‑Queueing Disaster

    • It was born in Theresa May’s era and expanded under Boris Johnson – meaning it was designed to scare rather than protect.
    • Platforms now remove and age‑gate harmless content—think speech around grooming gangs or a 19th‑century blog—just to dodge a fine or jail time.
    • There are no strong free‑speech safeguards in the text, so people feel like their honest opinions might land them in jail.

    The Chilling Effect

    Companies over‑censor because one misstep could mean a hefty fine or even criminal charges. As a result, a surprise twist is that you might now find old speeches behind a wax‑door of age restriction. All for the sake of “child protection.”

    More than Just Net‑Censorship?

    • We’re seeing 30+ arrests daily for “speech offenses,” a shocking number that suggests the law has a reach far beyond the internet.
    • Last decade, the NHS recorded 250,000 non‑crime hate incidents – many driven by online posts that challenge government talking points on immigration or gender.
    • The law threatens strict anonymity; encrypted apps like WhatsApp could see surveillance climb.
    • There’s chatter about reviving blasphemy laws under anti‑Islamophobia tags, and workplace rules might soon outlaw office banter unless it’s “harassment”‑free.

    How the Free Speech Union Is Rallying

    The Free Speech Union has seen a big surge in members—primarily gender‑critical women now, but anyone who feels veiled. Since the Labour government took the reins, many people are on edge, fearing that the law could widen into a blueprint for authoritarian censorship.

    Lively Call to Action

    Remember, this isn’t just politics—this is about quieting voices that dare to be honest. If you feel the same, support the fight against mass censorship by:

    • Donating through Locals
    • Checking out our merch
    • Staying informed on X by following @ModernityNews

    In a world that’s increasingly uncomfortable with dissent, Lord Toby Young’s plea is a rallying cry: let’s keep the conversation alive and free from the clutches of over‑protective regimes.

  • India's government to propose blanket ban on real-money gaming

    India's government to propose blanket ban on real-money gaming

    Real-money gaming companies are reeling as India moves to propose a blanket ban on their operations under a new legislation.

    The Indian government plans to prohibit real-money games — whether based on skill or chance — under its proposed online gaming regulation, per a draft seen by TechCrunch, which was also verified by three sources, including one consultant with the Indian IT ministry and two people working closely with the Indian government and real-money gaming companies.

    Proposed to be called the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025, the legislation would restrict online games involving real-money stakes and outlaw both their advertisements and financial transactions.

    “No bank, financial institution, or any other person facilitating financial transactions or authorization of funds shall engage in, permit, aid, abet, induce, or otherwise facilitate any transaction or authorization of funds towards payment for any online money gaming service,” the draft said.

    Real-money gaming has been the biggest revenue driver for India’s online gaming industry, which generated $3.8 billion in revenue in the financial year 2023–24 — a 23% increase year-over-year, per a recent report by gaming-focused VC firm Lumikai. Real-money gaming alone accounted for $2.4 billion of that total, the firm said.

    However, the sector has come under growing scrutiny amid public concerns over incidents of harm — including cases where individuals reportedly died by suicide after losing large sums of money in games. Industry stakeholders largely attribute these incidents to offshore betting and gambling apps, which continue to operate — and even expand — despite repeated claims by federal and state authorities of enforcement actions such as website blocks and account freezes.

    In 2023, the Indian government imposed a 28% tax on online gaming to curb real-money play — a move the industry called “catastrophic” and “unconstitutional.” Top investors, including Tiger Global and Kotak, urged Prime Minister Modi to reconsider, warning of $2.5 billion in write-offs and 1 million job losses. The tax stayed, though companies have challenged its retrospective application in the Supreme Court. However, it could rise to 40% under new rules, some recent reports suggested.

    The draft legislation states that real-money gaming companies could face imprisonment for up to three years, a fine of up to ₹10 million (approximately $115,000), or both. Similarly, celebrities promoting such games on any media platform could be liable for up to two years of imprisonment or a fine of ₹5 million (around $57,000). The bill also empowers the Indian government to establish a regulatory authority to oversee its implementation.

    “Businesses will shut if the legislation comes into force,” the founder of a leading Indian real-money gaming startup told TechCrunch, requesting anonymity as the draft is not public yet.

    Investors are equally concerned about the proposed law, which is expected to be tabled in the Indian parliament soon for debate.

    “All unicorns in this sector are going to be significantly impacted due to the move if it comes true,” an investor in Indian real-money gaming startups said, while not agreeing to be quoted on record as the proposal has yet to be released by the Indian government.

    Dream Sports, Games24x7, and WinZO are among India’s top real-money gaming startups. Collectively, they have raised billions of dollars and generate significant revenue from millions of users. India has the highest number of real-money gaming startups globally, per Tracxn, followed by the U.S. and the U.K.

    While many of these companies also offer non-monetized games, one founder told TechCrunch that real-money gaming accounts for over 85% of their total revenue. They did not comment on the record as the draft is not public, but agreed to share their thoughts anonymously.

    Likewise, some startups have explored going outside India to sustain their business amid regulatory challenges in the country. That has also not yet been fruitful for them, as they currently generate almost 100% of their revenue from India alone, the founder quoted above said.

    This is not the first time New Delhi has looked to regulate real-money gaming. In 2023, the Indian government amended the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, to curb “user harm” associated with real-money games. It proposed the creation of self-regulatory bodies to approve legitimate games while restricting illegal betting and gambling. However, the self-regulation model faltered due to conflicts among industry stakeholders over enforcement and standards.

    Local reports on Tuesday suggested that India’s Union Cabinet had cleared the proposed bill for its introduction in the lower house of parliament as early as Wednesday. However, the Indian government did not confirm the development.

    The Indian IT ministry did not respond to a request for comment.


    We’re always looking to evolve, and by providing some insight into your perspective and feedback into TechCrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill out this survey to let us know how we’re doing and get the chance to win a prize in return!

  • Appeals court says NLRB structure unconstitutional, in a win for SpaceX

    Appeals court says NLRB structure unconstitutional, in a win for SpaceX

    A federal appeals court handed SpaceX a win on Tuesday, in a ruling that prevents the National Labor Relations Board from prosecuting unfair labor practices against the company. The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which suggests the structure of the NLRB is likely unconstitutional, could have far-reaching effects.

    The ruling keeps unfair labor practice cases against SpaceX and two other companies, Energy Transfer and Findhelp, on hold while the companies pursue their claim that the NLRB structure violates the U.S. Constitution. While the court did declare it unlawful, this is far from a settled issue and the NLRB is undoubtedly likely to challenge the ruling.

    The three-judge panel said being subjected to a possibly unconstitutional administrative proceeding, which is what SpaceX claimed, is an irreparable harm — so the pause continues. The NLRB brought the unfair labor practices claim against SpaceX after it fired a group of employees who signed an open letter criticizing CEO Elon Musk and a culture of sexism in the company.

    The core of the dispute is over whether the NLRB’s in-house judges, called administrative law judges, enjoy unlawful protections that shield them from removal by the president. If that’s the case, it violates constitutional rules governing the separation of powers, the judges said.

    The panel included two judges appointed by President Donald Trump and a third judge appointed by George H.W. Bush.

    The story has been updated with the correct name of the appeals court.

    We’re always looking to evolve, and by providing some insight into your perspective and feedback into TechCrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill out this survey to let us know how we’re doing and get the chance to win a prize in return!

    Techcrunch event

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise.

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise.

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    REGISTER NOW