Tag: passengers

  • Campaigners Push to Stall EU Proposal Accused of Passenger Hostility

    Travelers Take a Stand Against the EU’s New Flight‑Compensation Cuts

    Air‑man fans across Europe are rallying together, launching a civic campaign aimed at stopping an EU draft law that threatens to slash passenger rights. The proposed regulation would raise the minimum delay before a passenger can claim any compensation, and it would slash the payouts for already stranded travelers.

    Why the Campaign Matters

    • Higher Delay Thresholds: The new rule would mean flights are allowed to be delayed up to 5 hours before customers get any reimbursement—think of that as giving airlines more leeway to roll the clock.
    • Reduced Compensation: Even when the delay thresholds are passed, the payable amounts would be slashed to roughly half the current levels.
    • Right‑to‑Refund Still Present: The initiative insists that customers should still be able to claim their money back if they dispute the reduced compensation.

    How the Campaign Is Rolling Out

    A coalition of consumer groups, advocacy bodies, and everyday travelers have launched a citizens’ initiative—essentially a petition that the European Parliament must consider. The initiative demands that the proposed law is either scrapped or amended to safeguard current passenger rights.

    What You Can Do
    • Sign the petition online—no big deal, just a click to help stop these new rules.
    • Share the campaign on social media so your friends and family know what’s happening.
    • Attend local rallies or meetings that support the effort—your voice matters.

    In short, passengers are saying “no thanks” to a regulation that would make it harder to fight for what you’re owed when you’re stuck in the skies. It’s time to keep flights fair, passengers happy, and airlines honest. Join the movement and let Europe remember that flying isn’t about ignoring your rights—it’s about standing up for them.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    A new citizens’ initiative is now collecting signatures to reverse what campaigners call a “passenger-hostile” EU proposal — one they say would cost air travellers across Europe money, time, and rights. 
    “After over a decade of legislative impasse, EU governments are worsening the rights of EU passengers, and we intend to enable Europeans to speak out and against this,” professor Alberto Alemanno, founder of The Good Lobby and one of the petition’s organisers, told Euronews. 

    While such an initiative doesn’t force the Commission to draft new laws, it does require a formal response within six months — including an explanation if it chooses not to act. 
    Under current EU rules, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 in compensation for delays of at least three hours. That may soon change. 
    After 12 years of political deadlock, a slim majority of EU countries recently backed raising the delay threshold to between four and six hours, while cutting compensation for long-haul flights (over 3,500 km) by €100. 
    The plan still needs approval from both the European Commission and the European Parliament — and MEPs across the political spectrum have already voiced strong opposition. 
    “People must always come first before profit, and this is no exception,” said Dutch S&D MEP Mohammed Chahim. “People are not asking air companies for a favour – they pay good money for the services and when these services are not delivered people deserve proper treatment and reasonable compensation.” 

    The European Consumer Association (BEUC) warned that the higher thresholds would block most EU passengers from claiming compensation, since most delays fall between two and four hours. 
    But Airlines for Europe (A4E) — representing carriers such as Ryanair, easyJet, and Lufthansa — argues the reform would make passenger rights “clearer” and “easier” to enforce. 
    “Today, airlines are often forced to cancel flights they could otherwise operate with a delay, because short delays trigger compensation,” its managing director, Ourania Georgoutsakou, told Euronews in an emailed statement. “Most people want to reach their destination, not wait around for a payout.”  
    The European Commission’s original plan involved increasing the time threshold from three to five hours for short-haul flights, and from three to nine hours for long-haul flights. 

    “Our analysis shows that this change alone could prevent up to 70% of avoidable cancellations across Europe,” Georgoutsakou said, adding that it would help airlines recover schedules faster, reduce knock-on delays, and avoid unnecessary cancellations. 
    Parliament has until early October to present its counter-position — in response to the Council, which in June skipped its usual informal talks with MEPs and adopted a legally binding stance. 
    “We cannot allow the member states to undermine the hard-won rights of air passengers,” MEP Andrey Novakov (Bulgaria/EPP), leading negotiator on the file, said after the Council adopted its position in June.  
    “Weakening these rights would betray the trust that citizens have placed in the EU to defend their interests,” Novakov concluded.  

  • MEPs Call for Two Free Carry‑On Items for European Flights

    MEPs Call for Two Free Carry‑On Items for European Flights

    EU Transport Committee Wants Free Hand‑Luggage – Airlines Say It’s a Roadblock to Freedom

    What the Proposal Really Means

    In a move that could change how we pack for travel, the European Parliament’s Transport Committee is pushing for a new rule that lets passengers bring free carry‑on bags, but only if they fit within specific size limits. The aim? Make flying less of a guessing game for seats, shoes, and that squeaky suitcase you insist on carrying.

    Key Points of the New Rule

    • Free carry‑on for all – no extra fees will be charged for bringing a backpack, duffel, or a small suitcase.
    • <li Size limits are strictly defined: 55 × 40 × 20 cm (incl. handles and wheels). No big hulking bags allowed.

      <li One bag per passenger – you can’t bring a tote and a duffel.

      <li Carry‑on only means your over‑size luggage still has to go in the cargo hold.

    Airlines Agree to Some, But Worry About the Guesswork

    Most carriers have jumped to the “yes” side, hoping the oversight will reduce in‑flight hiccups. But a few airlines explain why a blanket free carry‑on policy could backfire:

    • Some still want to cushion their revenue from the “extra baggage” trend.
    • There’s a fear that too many people will fly with more than one essential bag. This could mean more cabin space occupied and a higher risk of oversize items ticking over.
    • With no vector for customization, it’ll be tougher to match the specific needs of every passenger’s itinerary.

    What Passengers Get From This Move

    For you, the traveler, the rule is a win in many ways:

    • No more cash‑clippings chasing you to pay for that coveted loaner suitcase.
    • Less time at the check‑in desk, with a quicker transition straight to the gate for flights that do not rely on overhead bin space.
    • A chance to put the “free” tag on this, and become the travel hero you always wanted to be.

    Bottom Line

    Fairer packing rules and fewer cash‑falls are the promise of the EU Transport Committee, but flights are still binding by the practical reality that a plane’s overhead bins are a finite resource. The whole debate boils down to balancing passenger freedom with operational practicality — a tightrope that raises more than just a few tourism questions.

    EU Parliament Gives Passengers 2 Free Hand Luggage Items

    After a lively debate that felt more like a game of Tug‑of‑War, the European Parliament’s Transport Committee finally took a stand on a hot topic: free hand luggage. MEPs have decided that passengers can bring two pieces of personal baggage without paying an extra fee.

    How Big Can Your Handbag Be?

    The committee went down the rabbit hole of size limits, and here’s the plan:

    • Backpack or handbag – already part of the hand luggage allowance.
    • Personal item – a small clutch or tablet case.
    • Additional hand luggage – must not exceed a total dimension of 100 cm (height + width + depth).

    Andrey Novakov (EPP) admitted, “We dialed down the size to make everyone happy, but the ticket price still covers the baggage.”

    What the Consumer Side Has To Say

    The European Consumers’ Organisation (BEUC) cheered the vote:

    “This is a basic consumer expectation. It aligns perfectly with the Court of Justice ruling that hand luggage of a reasonable size shouldn’t carry extra charges.”

    Opposition From Airlines

    Airlines for Europe (A4E), representing 17 carriers, are less thrilled. They argue:

    “MEPs have used this vote to sneak in amendments that deprive passengers of choice and give them less control over what they pay for. Until, we’ll be forced to charge for hand luggage just because we want to.”

    Contrast With Earlier Ministerial Decision

    Earlier this month, the 27 transport ministers of the EU decided airlines could charge for hand luggage, provided the limits were clearly listed. The Parliament vote runs counter to that.

    Additional Provisions

    The committee also proposed:

    • People with reduced mobility may travel with a companion free of charge.
    • Children aged 12 can sit next to their caregiver at no extra cost.

    In the end, the Parliament’s decision is a win for travellers hoping to keep their pockets light—and a reminder that policy battles can be as dramatic as a last‑minute airline upgrade.