Tag: products

  • US President meets BHP and Rio Tinto chiefs over Arizona copper mine

    US President meets BHP and Rio Tinto chiefs over Arizona copper mine

    Executives of two of the world’s biggest mining companies, BHP and Rio Tinto, have lobbied at the White House as part of their long-running bid to develop a vast copper mine in the US.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    US President Donald Trump welcomed Rio Tinto CEO Jakob Stausholm and incoming CEO Simon Trott, as well as BHP CEO Mike Henry, to the Oval Office on Tuesday to discuss the developments around a vast copper mine project called Resolution Copper.
    This came a day after the opponents succeeded in temporarily blocking the project. 

    The president called opponents of a huge copper mine in Arizona “radical left activists” in a social media post after the meeting.
    The project  — a joint venture owned by international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — is set to be one of the biggest copper mines in North America.
    President Trump has emphasised the need for more copper production in the US, as the versatile metal is important for the country’s mineral security. Copper is key to the energy transition and has many uses, remaining an essential component of electrical circuits, as well as defence and technology products.
    The two international mining giants teamed up to develop Resolution Copper after the deposit was discovered two decades ago.
    However, Native American tribes and environmentalists have been fighting fiercely ever since, citing religious, cultural and environmental concerns.

    After a series of court cases and environmental studies, the companies were set to take over the federal forest land in Arizona on Tuesday when a US appeals court temporarily blocked the transfer, delaying the mining.
    The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction late on Monday in response to last-minute appeals by a Native American tribe and environmentalists.

    The land includes Oak Flat — an area used for centuries for religious ceremonies, prayer and gathering of medicinal plants by the San Carlos Apache people and other Native American tribes. The tribe celebrated the pause.

    President Donald Trump, however, called the opponents “Anti-American, and representing other copper competitive countries,” in his post on Truth Social. He also stated that delaying the project would affect thousands of jobs.
    A press release from Resolution Copper stated that the companies view this as “merely a temporary pause”. The statement added: “We are confident the court will ultimately affirm the district court’s well-reasoned orders explaining in detail why the congressionally directed land exchange satisfies all applicable legal requirements.”
    Mike Henry, CEO of BHP, said in a social media post that the project “will create thousands of high-value local jobs in Arizona and billions in economic activity across America”. 

    An earlier estimate from Resolution Copper stated that the mine would generate $1 billion (€860 million) a year for Arizona’s economy and create thousands of jobs.

    A brief history of opposing Resolution Copper

    The fight over Oak Flat has spanned two decades, with the latest legal wrangling centred on a required environmental review that was released by the US Forest Service earlier this summer and an appraisal of the land to be mined by Resolution Copper about 60 miles (96 kilometres) east of Phoenix.
    Before the land exchange can happen, the plaintiffs argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that covers “every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure”. 
    They said the government failed to consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure and if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area.
    As for the appraisal, they said it did not account for the value of the copper deposits that are at least 5,000 feet (1,500 metres) below the surface.

    Related

    Copper prices near an all-time high amid Trump’s tariff threats, China’s stimulusWhy copper, aluminium and steel are at the core of Trump’s MAGA ideology

    The appeals court plans to hear arguments on the merits of the case later this year, but no date has been announced yet. 
    “This injunction comes in a desperate time of asking for miracles, all over the country and all over the world,” Wendsler Nosie Sr. of the group Apache Stronghold said in a statement shared on social media.
    Resolution Copper has said the project underwent an extensive review by the US Forest Service that has included consultation with tribes that have ancestral ties to the land.
    “The collaborative process has directly led to major changes to the mining plan to preserve and reduce potential impacts on tribal, social, environmental and cultural interests,” the company stated.
    The Forest Service has argued in court filings that it has no discretion because the land exchange was mandated by Congress when language was included in a must-pass national defence spending bill that was signed into law in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama.
    There have been unsuccessful legislative attempts in the years since to withdraw the Oak Flat area from mining activity.

  • Phony TechCrunch Outreach Puts Companies on the Hook

    TechCrunch Impersonators: A Quick Heads-Up

    Hey there, fellow tech enthusiast! We’ve got some vital intel to share—someone’s turning the TechCrunch brand into a sham, and it’s baiting both the whole media scene and your own company. Let’s dive in and keep those scammers at bay.

    Why This Matters to Us and You

    • We’re seeing a surge of walk‑in “reporters” and “event leads” who claim to be from TechCrunch, but they’re actually sweet‑talking fraudsters.
    • These impostors use the news outlet’s reputation to get your confidential info—not the kind of info you’d want in the wrong hands.
    • It’s not just a TechCrunch issue; fraudsters are weaponising the trust that comes with well‑known media brands to unlock data across the industry.

    Typical “Pitch” You’ll Spot

    Imagine a curious press release asking you for a quick interview about your latest product. Sounds harmless? That’s exactly the bait most scams drop. The scammer adopts a real staff name, copies a copy‑editor’s tone, then requests an “introductory call.” If you get the call, the attacker digs for even deeper insights.

    How to Spot the Red Flags

    • Check the email address: Fake addresses often bend or replace domains (e.g., email-techcrunch.com).
    • Verify the person: Search the TechCrunch staff page—if the name isn’t there, they’re most likely a fraud.
    • Match the job role: If a copy editor suddenly wants to know your proprietary business secrets, something’s off.
    • When in doubt, ask direct: Reach out to us via the contact info on each writer’s bio to confirm legitimacy.
    What We Think is Behind the Scam

    It all boils down to one thing: access. People playing “TechCrunch” are looking for a foothold into networks or valuable data for future account takeover or data theft—especially targeting the crypto, cloud, and tech sectors.

    Preventive Checklist: Stay Safe

    1. Confirm via Staff Page—names that pop up, but never either.
    2. Assess the Request—does it line up with the role?
    3. Reach Out to Us Directly—we’ve got contact details for every writer, editor, and event lead.
    4. When in doubt, refuse or postpone unless you’re certain.

    We know it’s a pain to double‑check every “media” outreach. But remember, your due diligence protects you and keeps the credibility of real journalists intact.

    Recent Fake Domains (FYI)

    • email-techcrunch.com
    • hr-techcrunch.com
    • interview-techcrunch.com
    • mail-techcrunch.com
    • media-techcrunch.com
    • noreply-tc-techcrunch.com
    • noreply-techcrunch.com
    • pr-techcrunch.com
    • techcrunch-outreach.com
    • techcrunch-startups.info
    • techcrunch-team.com
    • techcrunch.ai
    • techcrunch.biz.id
    • techcrunch.bz
    • techcrunch.cc
    • techcrunch.chte
    • techcrunch.com.pl
    • techcrunch.gl
    • techcrunch.gstechcrunch.id
    • techcrunch.it
    • techcrunch.latechcrunch.lt
    • techcrunch.net.cn
    • techcrunch1.com

    Thank you for staying alert and protecting the community. Together, we’ll keep the tech press honest and scam-free.

  • Monarch Tractors won't be built by Foxconn after Ohio factory sale

    Foxconn will no longer build electric tractors for California startup Monarch Tractor after the Taiwanese tech giant recently sold its Ohio factory to SoftBank.

    Monarch CEO Praveen Penmetsa confirmed the news in a LinkedIn comment Tuesday. He also said his company worked with Foxconn to “build up inventory” before the sale of the factory, noting his startup has “enough to meet customer demand for the next 12 months, along with ample spare parts.”

    “In the coming weeks, we will be sharing more about our plans to introduce more Monarch-enabled products in the market through new manufacturing partnerships,” Penmetsa wrote.

    Following the sale, SoftBank is expected to work with Foxconn to use the factory to make equipment for the Stargate AI project led by OpenAI and Oracle.

    Foxconn purchased the former General Motors factory from EV startup Lordstown Motors in 2022. Young Liu, Foxconn’s chairman, said prior to the sale closing that the facility was going to be the “most important electric vehicle manufacturing and R&D hub in North America.”

    Monarch was one of four companies Foxconn promoted as customers (or potential customers) of the electric vehicle contract manufacturing operation it tried to establish at the former General Motors factory. Foxconn built a few hundred tractors for Monarch at the plant, but the startup has struggled. Last year, it went through two rounds of layoffs and had to quickly pivot to new types of customers as California’s wine industry crashed.

    The other three companies Foxconn wanted to build vehicles for have all filed for bankruptcy. While Foxconn made a handful of Lordstown Motors pickups at the plant, the startup went under in 2023. The other two prospective customers were Fisker Inc. and a small California startup called IndiEV. Foxconn never built any vehicles for those companies at the factory, and they have also both since gone out of business.

    Techcrunch event

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise.

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise.

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    REGISTER NOW

    We’re always looking to evolve, and by providing some insight into your perspective and feedback into TechCrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill out this survey to let us know how we’re doing and get the chance to win a prize in return!

  • Hugo Boss Takes Legal Stand Against Liverpool Pet Brand in BOSS Name Showdown

    Hugo Boss Takes Legal Stand Against Liverpool Pet Brand in BOSS Name Showdown

    A small business owner from Liverpool has been ordered by global fashion house Hugo Boss to take down his website over alleged trademark infringement for using the word “Boss” in the name of his pet wellness company.

    Bootle Kid’s “Boss” Bonanza Gets a Hoodwink from Hugo Boss

    Ben McDonald —yes, the same namesake who hopped into the pet‑care scene with Boss Pets earlier this year—found himself swimming in a sea of legal dust after Hugo Boss sent a ‘stop‑and‑forget’ letter. The letter demanded he ditch the brand name and pull his website down within 10 days or risk a full-on lawsuit.

    He Just Wanted a Paw‑tential Profit

    Made in the heart of Bootle, Ben invested every last penny of his savings to launch an online pet‑health empire. When the cease‑and‑desist hit, he said the whole world “collapsed.” He’s a simple boot‑shiner from the North‑West, just trying to get his venture off the ground.

    “Boss” Is a Scouse Gem, Not a Fashion Brand

    In Scouse slang, the word boss means “top‑notch” or “awesome.” Naturally, once Ben incorporated that local slang into his brand, a furious trademark nerd from Hugo Boss decided it was his job to hunt it down.

    The Legal Jab

    Lawyer Francis McEntegart scooped up Ben’s defense, calling the suit “disproportionate.” “Ben’s just a small local business selling pet wellness goodies,” he said. “He’s not going to eat into Hugo Boss’s profits.”

    Hugo Boss’s “It’s All About the Rights” Speech

    In response, a Hugo Boss spokesperson quoted, “We’re aware that ‘boss’ is a common English word, but we must protect our brand rights worldwide.” “We’ve got to guard both of our trademarks, Boss and Hugo,” they added, sounding as firm as a runway model’s suit.

    History remembers 2020, when comedian Joe Lycett cheekily changed his name to Hugo Boss as a protest against the company’s hard‑right stance on the word. Yet, this latest clash suggests Hugo Boss isn’t softening anytime soon.

    What’s Next For Ben?

    Ben’s outlook is murky. “I picked the name because it’s what we say in Liverpool when something’s killer. No ties to suits,” he laments. The burger‑band made of muscle webs and fashion is now writing new chapters every time a local venture flirts with a global brand’s name. Who knows? Maybe it just means the world of “boss” is a bit more complicated than we thought.

  • Chinese envoy touts prospects for business cooperation on eve of EU-China summit

    Chinese envoy touts prospects for business cooperation on eve of EU-China summit

    List of Chinese investments in Europe namechecked, and cooperation on research and intellectual property underlined, though mood music for EU-China summit has dampened expectations.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Prospects for pragmatic China-EU cooperation remain broad, China’s head of EU mission has written in an exclusive op-ed for Euronews, published on the eve of a delicate summit of leaders taking place in Beijing on Thursday.
    “European businesses are finding ample space to expand in the Chinese market,” according to Ambassador Cai Run, the head of the Chinese Mission to the EU, in an op-ed that lists a string of investment and cooperation relations.

    In the piece, Cai notes that “brands such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen derive over 30% of their global sales from the Chinese market, with profits in China reaching up to 30 times those earned in their domestic markets.”
    He claims that European products account for more than 30% and in some cases over 50% of China’s total imports in sectors such as chemicals, optics, aerospace and aviation.
    Meanwhile Chinese corporate investment in Europe is listed at length. Cai namechecks the Pelješac Bridge project in Croatia; the Hungary-Serbia Railway, “China’s first high-speed rail project in Europe”, and Piraeus Port in Greece.
    Of Piraeus, Cai claims in the op-ed that the project has created 4,300 direct local jobs and generated €1.4 billion in economic output, “accounting for approximately 1% of Greece’s GDP”.

    Response to climate change is a unifying factor – Chinese envoy

    Cai also touts cooperation through the China-EU Climate Change Partnership, saying China’s electric vehicle and new energy battery industries “have become key drivers of a new wave of investment in Europe, further strengthening the bonds of cooperation and injecting strong momentum into China-EU collaboration in the green and low-carbon sector.”

    Related

    EU shuts out Chinese medical suppliers from European market in retaliatory trade move

    On research Cai says the Chinese government is prioritizing the EU as a key partner, and “remains committed to an open and innovation-driven policy, expanding international scientific and technological cooperation”.
    He also hails the Geographic Indications (GI) Agreement as China’s “first comprehensive and high-level bilateral agreement on GI protection, marking a milestone in China-EU cooperation on intellectual property rights.”
    Since its entry into force, he says, Zhouzhi kiwifruit and French champagne “have entered each other’s markets, helping preserve cultural and natural heritage and injecting new momentum into deeper China-EU collaboration.”

     Despite the envoy’s optimistic tone, however, expectations for the outcome of Thursday’s summit are muted, despite its coinciding with the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU.
    Among the extensive list of friction points, two stand out: Beijing’s “no-limits” partnership with Moscow and the trade imbalances caused by industrial overcapacity.
    In May, Chinese President Xi Jinping said the anniversary offered a chance to “properly handle frictions and differences, and open up a brighter future for China-EU relations”. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and António Costa, the president of the European Council, played into the momentum and committed themselves to “deepening our partnership with China”.
    But since then the tide has shifted.
    Beijing’s decision to restrict the export of rare earths, the metallic elements that are crucial for manufacturing advanced technologies, caused widespread alarm across European industry and earned a rebuke from von der Leyen herself.
    “China is using this quasi-monopoly not only as a bargaining chip, but also weaponising it to undermine competitors in key industries,” she said at the G7 summit in June.
    “We all witnessed the cost and consequences of China’s coercion.”
    Beijing immediately hit back against the Commission chief, calling her speech “baseless” and “biased”, but offered an olive branch to build a “win-win” partnership.