Tag: sided

  • Judge Urges Every American to Wake Up About FTC Probe of Media Matters

    Judge Sacks FTC’s Probe of Media Matters, a Big First‑Amendment Win

    1. The Back‑Ground Story‑time

    It all started when Media Matters released a report in 2023 that a bunch of big‑brand ads on X—Elon Musk’s platform—were getting ad‑dressed next to mind‑bending antisemitic and other nasty content. Suddenly advertisers began pulling their money out, and X took the stage as if it were a theatrical drama, suing both Media Matters and the advertiser camps for what it called a “systematic illegal boycott.”

    When Trump, a known ally of Musk, came back into the White House, the FTC—led by Andrew Ferguson—decided it was time to investigate whether Media Matters was secretly collaborating with advertisers to sabotage the platform.

    2. Why the FTC came in

    • Ferguson had shown himself a bit… militant: he appeared on Steve Bannon’s podcast, calling for an FTC sweep of progressive groups that criticized online disinformation.
    • He hired “several senior FTC staffers who had publicly spoken about Media Matters,” raising a red flag for folks who value impartiality.

    3. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan’s 2‑Minute Decision

    On Friday, Judge Sparkle took a stand. She blocked the FTC’s investigation, calling Media Matters’ coverage a “quintessential First Amendment activity.” The FTC’s “expansive” request? She saw it as a classic case of retaliatory prosecution.

    “It should alarm all Americans when the Government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,” she wrote. And she added, “And that alarm should ring even louder when the Government retaliates against those engaged in newsgathering and reporting.”

    4. What This Means for the Future

    • The FTC has yet to announce whether it will appeal.
    • But this ruling is a loud bell that the government must tread carefully when it comes to First Amendment protections, especially when influencers and advertisers are involved.

    So here’s a toast to free speech and to the brave folks who keep the press and the public informed—even when corporate money comes in and out like a roller coaster. Cheers!

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise.

    Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

    Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise.

    What’s Cooking in San Francisco: X’s Lawsuits Stir the Pot!

    Mark Your Calendar

    San Francisco, October 27‑29 2025 – If you can’t be there, keep an eye on the fallout!

    Outcomes, Regardless of the Judge’s Verdict

    Even before the courtroom decides, X’s legal juggernaut has already shaken its targets.

    • Media Matters has trimmed its workforce. One of the lay‑off researchers is now eyeing Congress.
    • World Federation of Advertisers halted its brand‑safety program and has expressed concerns about plummeting funds.

    FTC Investigation: The Unintended Side‑Effect

    Sooknanan explained that the FTC probe forced Media Matters to pause certain stories about the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, and Mr. Musk – a clean‑cut “intended effect,” he said.

    Why It Matters

    It’s not just about the legal fights; it’s also about who’s running to the headlines next.

    Your Voice Can Shape Tomorrow

    We’re always aiming to improve, and your input is the secret sauce. Tell TechCrunch what you think about our coverage and upcoming events.

    Fill out this survey, share your thoughts, and you might just snag a prize! Keep it fun, keep it real, and help us keep the conversation lively.

  • Meta and Anthropic Celebrate Winning Verdicts in Key US AI Copyright Cases

    Meta and Anthropic Celebrate Winning Verdicts in Key US AI Copyright Cases

    The two companies at the forefront of the artificial intelligence race won two key verdicts from US courts this week regarding whether they can train on copyrighted books.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Leading tech companies won a few verdicts this week in US artificial intelligence (AI) copyright lawsuits.
    Federal judges sided with Facebook parent Meta Platforms and AI company Anthropic in two separate verdicts.

    The case against Meta was brought by a group of authors who accused the company of stealing their works to train its AI technology. The Anthropic case decided that the company’s AI Claude didn’t break copyright rules by training on millions of copyrighted books.
    US District Judge Vince Chhabria found that the 13 authors who sued Meta “made the wrong arguments,” so the case got thrown out – but that doesn’t mean the use of copyright materials is lawful.

    Related

    Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement

    In his 40-page ruling, Chhabria repeatedly said Meta and other AI companies have turned into serial copyright infringers as they train their technology on books and other works created by humans.
    “This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,” Chhabria wrote.

    Earlier this week, US District Judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic didn’t break the law but the company must still go to trial because it obtained those books from pirate websites instead of buying them.

    Related

    More than 400 artists send letter to Trump over AI companies exploiting copyrighted works

    But the actual process of an AI system distilling from thousands of written works to be able to produce its own passages of text qualified as “fair use” under US copyright law because it was “quintessentially transformative,” Alsup wrote.
    Books are important sources of data needed to build large language models.

    In the race to outdo each other in developing the most advanced AI chatbots, a number of tech companies have turned to online repositories of stolen books that they can get for free.