Tag: speech

  • Big Tech Could Soon Use Brain Chips To Read Your Innermost Thoughts: Study

    Big Tech Could Soon Use Brain Chips To Read Your Innermost Thoughts: Study

    A new study out of Stanford University reveals that neural implants, also known as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), might not just help paralyzed individuals communicate – they could potentially lay bare your innermost thoughts to Big Tech.

    Published in the medical journal Cell, the research shows these devices can decode brain signals to produce synthesized speech faster and with less effort.

    BCIs work by using tiny electrode arrays to monitor activity in the brain’s motor cortex, the region controlling speech-related muscles. Until now, the tech relied on signals from paralyzed individuals actively trying to speak. The Stanford team, however, discovered that even imagined speech generates similar, though weaker, signals in the motor cortex. With the help of artificial intelligence, they translated those faint signals into words with up to 74% accuracy from a 125,000-word vocabulary.

    “We’re recording the signals as they’re attempting to speak and translating those neural signals into the words that they’re trying to say,” said Erin Kunz, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford’s Neural Prosthetics Translational Laboratory.

    But this technological leap has raised red flags among critics who warn of a dystopian future where your private thoughts could be exposed.

    Nita Farahany, a Duke University law and philosophy professor and author of The Battle for Your Brain, sounded the alarm telling NPR, “The more we push this research forward, the more transparent our brains become.”

    Farahany expressed concern that tech giants like Apple, Google, and Meta could exploit BCIs to access consumers’ minds without consent, urging safeguards like passwords to protect thoughts meant to stay private.

    We have to recognize that this new era of brain transparency really is an entirely new frontier for us,” Farahany said.

    While the world fixates on artificial intelligence, some of the tech industry’s heaviest hitters are pouring billions into BCIs. Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, has raised $1.2 billion for his Neuralink venture, which is now conducting clinical trials with top institutions like the Barrow Neurological Institute, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, and the Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi.

    Now, another tech titan is entering the fray.

    OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman is launching Merge Labs to challenge Musk’s Neuralink. Backed by OpenAI’s venture arm and valued at $850 million, Merge Labs is seeking $250 million in funding, according to the Financial Times. While Altman will serve as a co-founder alongside Alex Blania of the iris-scanning World project, sources say he won’t take an operational role.

    Loading recommendations…
  • Watch: Man Arrested In UK For Saying "We Love Bacon"

    Watch: Man Arrested In UK For Saying "We Love Bacon"

    Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

    A British man has been arrested for saying “we love bacon” while protesting the building of a proposed giant mosque.

    The Telegraph reports that the protest occurred at the site of planned super mosque in the Lake District, which is populated by an almost 100% white population.

    The report further notes that the 23-year-old man, was not otherwise being disruptive, causing any damage or being in any way violent.

    The arresting police officer claims that the grounds for the detainment were “racial abuse.”

    Telegraph writer Isabel Oakeshott notes:

    Of course Muslims don’t eat pork. As a result, they cannot share this particular delight with the rest of us. However, despite a steady rise in our own Muslim population, the UK remains a Christian country. Supposedly, we also enjoy free speech. Why then did the unfortunate father find himself frogmarched away from the protest by two police officers?

    Saying ‘We love bacon’ is simply a truism. We British do love it, and there is nothing wrong with saying so.

    As for remarks about bacon near a religious site or in the company of Muslims, they hardly constitute public disorder, still less ‘racial abuse,’ as the officer who arrested him can be heard suggesting.

    The South Lakes Islamic Centre, often referred to as the Kendal mosque due to its proximity to the town of Kendal in Cumbria, is a £2.5 million facility under construction in Dalton-in-Furness on the edge of the Lake District.

    Construction began in March 2025, with reports indicating that the structure is now nearing completion despite challenges like suppliers refusing to provide materials amid public backlash.

    Opposition to the project has been vocal, with groups staging protests at the site since last month. Critics cite concerns over increased noise, traffic, and cultural impact in a rural area, but a core argument revolves around the region’s demographics: the Lake District and surrounding Cumbria have a Muslim population of approximately 0.4%, or around 2,000 people across the county, raising questions about the necessity of what some dub a “mega mosque” in such a sparsely populated Muslim area.

    Detractors suggest it’s disproportionate, especially with nearby facilities like mosques in Carlisle, Penrith, and Whitehaven, and speculate it could signal plans for larger-scale housing or migration to the area.

    As we’ve previously highlighted, the Lake District is just one sleepy area of the UK where the government has decided to drop hundreds of illegal immigrants into small villages without notifying or warning residents.

    Many who shared the video of the man’s arrest on social media suggested it is yet another example of the ‘two tier’ society that has emerged in the UK.

    Others took an opportunity to express their right to… like bacon.

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    Loading recommendations…
  • DOJ Deploys Grand Jury to Probe Letitia James\’ Trump Prosecution

    DOJ Deploys Grand Jury to Probe Letitia James\’ Trump Prosecution

    Justice Department Opens Two Fresh Investigations into NY AG Letitia James

    Why the Scrutiny?

    The U.S. Justice Department has taken a sharp turn toward the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, accusing her and her office of targeting political opponents with malicious intent. Two separate probes are now underway to dig into these claims.

    What These Investigations Cover

    • Potential misuse of publicly funded resources to nuke rivals.
    • Allegations that state offices were used as pawn‑shops for political sabotage.
    • Suspected overreach of legal powers to serve partisan agendas.
    Key Allegations Summarized

    According to the DOJ claims:

    • The AG’s office may have engaged in “espionage” against political adversaries.
    • Evidence points to a systematic campaign aimed at crippling opponents before upcoming elections.
    • There is a question about whether the actions were lawful under state and federal statutes.
    What’s Next?

    The investigations will involve:

    • Collecting documents, emails, and witness testimonies.
    • Potential subpoenas issued to major consulting firms tied to the AG’s office.
    • Possible hearings before federal judges if the evidence warrants it.

    It’s a developing story, so keep an eye out for official DOJ releases and court filings. Whether these probes hold water remains to be seen, but the entire political scene will be watching closely.

    Attorney in Albany Fires Two Subpoenas, Sparks Cookery of Legal Fire

    What’s the Beef?

    Yo, hold onto your hats: the U.S. attorney in Albany, Daniel Hanlon, dropped two subpoenas for James. The first one is the “office‑side civil fraud” case vs. President Trump, while the second is all about shredding the NRA. The Justice Department is already saying this might wound Trump’s constitutional rights.

    Joe Biden’s Office vs. Trump’s Freedom

    • “Mayor of New York Court” James is accused of launching a war on Trump because “she didn’t like him.”
    • The DOJ claims she violated Trump’s First Amendment and got him to lose his free‑speech shield.
    • She even sent a subpoena to the NRA because the AG Pam Bondi gave the green light.

    The Dollar Drama

    What in the world happened with the $454 million bond? Judge Engoron slapped Trump with a jaw‑breaker that made a New York judge think he was laughing at a joke. A law professor from GJW, Jonathan Turley, called that “completely off the mark.” The courts later reduced it to $175 million and Trump paid it in March 2024.

    Trump’s Reaction on Truth Social

    Trump hit back: “He’s a nut who made up numbers.” He warned businesses “won’t even want to be in New York” because of the decision. He blamed it on Joe Biden and a White House “election interference” maneuver. But the lawyer still stands: “We’re not dropping the case, presidents aren’t protected in civil suits.

    Legal Beef from the GOP Side

    • Mike Davis, a Trump‑linked GOP lawyer, threatened that if James keeps fighting, she might end up in prison.
    • He said, “I dare you to keep law‑busting Trump in his second term.”
    • He warned that any violation of constitutional rights would be punished.

    Other Legal Showdowns

    In 2025, some big stakes were thrown onto the table:

    • In March, Tulsi Gabbard (Director of National Intelligence) revoked James’s clearance among other Democrat officials, accusing them of slinging DOJ power for partisan gain.
    • The DOJ opened a criminal investigation on mortgage fraud involving James’s properties in Norfolk and Brooklyn.
    • She got a special prosecutor, Ed Martin, to dig into the case and a grand jury in Virginia will take the mortgage fraud. Meanwhile, a Maryland grand jury will sniff out allegations against Senator Adam Schiff.

    Defense Voices

    James’ lawyer Abbe Lowell called the latest probe a “bottom‑line example of presidential retaliation.” He warned: “Using DOJ to punish an elected office is a glitch in the system.” Also, Geoff Burgan, the spokesperson, declared, “We stay fierce with the NRA fight and keep protecting New Yorkers.”

    Academia Says, “Make It Work.”

    Law professor Turley posted on X: “I doubt the prosecution will hold without shocking evidence from the grand jury. Even if the court misread it, James had the upper hand in the balance.”

    Final Word

    The latest allegations come from a DOJ “strike force” that originally looked at tying Trump to Russia in 2016 but has now broadened its scope. Whether this investigation will bite remains to be seen, but the drama is only getting hotter. Stay tuned for the next season of legal theater in Albany.

  • PR advice: Seeding a story is equally important to news reaction

    PR advice: Seeding a story is equally important to news reaction

    The equal and opposite action of reacting to trending news and then coat tail riding the story of the day with your expert opinions – is the seeded or placed story. This is where you set your own news agenda in the form of a bespoke narrative.

    News reaction through parasitic means and its opposite, News procreation, really do work together in harmony to steadily build and maintain media profile.
    They go together like a hand in a glove. Or a hammer and anvil, the military technique involving the use of two primary forces, one to pin down an enemy, and the other to smash the opponent.
    You certainly don’t want one without the other in terms of the long-term building of a robust profile.
    You see a number of faces on ITV This Morning or GB News that appear as experts regularly whether it’s Medical or to do with the Construction Industry. But then that’s the only place you ever see or hear about them. They’re not outputting any of their own native content into the public domain whatsoever. Just take take take in the form of grabbing an existing story breaking in the news and having a strong opinion about it, on either side of the narrative divide.
    Former Channel 4 Chairman and CEO of Risk Capital, Luke Johnson, is an example of someone who has got a healthy mix of news reaction and news procreation in terms of his public persona. With his regular ‘The Maverick’ columns over the years for the Sunday Telegraph, these all got turned into a book, The Maverick: Dispatches From An Unrepentant Capitalist. Now he’s in the Sunday Times with a weekly column, only paused briefly in 2019 when Patisserie Valerie, which he chaired, went down, to let the dust settle. His new book Start It Up: Why Running Your Own Business Is Easier Than You Think has put him back in the author stakes. Twitter acts as one big news reaction opportunity for Johnson, where he risks his own reputation for what he believes in with regards to his extremely strong views about the wiping out of our freedoms. On the back of this, bookers from news channels cherry-pick what he’s saying about Covid, Climate, our fundamental freedoms and the Economy and book him regularly to discuss his views on breaking stories.
    Toby Young, head of the Free Speech Union, keeps working the two techniques. He’ll write books like How To Win Friends And Alienate People but also regularly stands up for Freedom of Expression rights of people right across the political spectrum and attacks trending stories in this space as an expert.
    While parasiting is a ‘quick hit’, the procreation bit can often be a bit more involved, just like it is in real life!
    No matter how well-intentioned and thought through your proactive grand announcement might be, backed up with tonnes of field research, the paid-for PR Newswire release to 100,000 or 1,000,000 contacts can so often go into a vacuum. Often with no rhyme or reason. It just misses completely. You send out your wonderful communication and the world seemingly falls into total silence.
    Any journalist will tell you that press releases so often miss the fundamentals of narrative.
    When they’re sent out, so often all the juice has been drained from them, in a diluted, bland form. A shadow of their former selves after edit after edit by a committee.
    Journalists field between 300 and 1,000 press releases every day.
    That’s an awful lot of well-thought-through releases wanting to fertilise a very finite number of eggs.
    There is a very finite quota of stories pertaining to a particular Subject area in any media outlet including radio and television just like there is in a national newspaper.
    This breaks down into National news subdivided up into Crime, Health, Environment, Consumer etc. Lifestyle which includes wellbeing, fashion and cooking. International news. Local news. Opinion. Features. Entertainment such as TV, cinema and travel. Business. Sport.
    There’s only a quota of 2 or 3 stories in each of the categories that will ever see the light of day each day. The rest will fall by the wayside.
    All the releases swimming like sperm have to not only prove to be the strongest, but also pass a full MOT test.
    Is there evidence provided for the claims made in the story? If not, it makes the media outlet liable to be sued. Does the story fit a typical preordained story-genre that journalists are familiar with so they recognise it as a story in the first place?
    But then ironically, does the outer edge of the story seemingly explode and shatter pre-held beliefs or norms?
    The fresh, breaking story is generally the collision of two fundamental opposites – a hostile act – to create a new.
    A newspaper is full of hundreds of these ‘mini deaths’.
    The French call an orgasm la petite mort. This means “the brief loss or weakening of consciousness” but most importantly, “the sensation post orgasm as likened to a mini death”.
    Stories that get across the line are essentially the collision of opposities, or ‘deaths’ which creates the new realisation.
    Interestingly, if you take a look at a Thesaurus, the definitions of ‘Collision’ and ‘Creation’ are antonymous, having the opposite meaning. The Collision Noun means the forceful coming together of two things.
    But importantly, it’s through the Collison or Destruction, that comes the new Creation.
    But fundamentally, it needs the Collision first.
    That is the whole basis of the news agenda, and how and why your proactive content can form a part of it.
    The leveraging, placing or seeding of the story so often occurs with just one particular journalist ‘taking the punt’.
    In the spirit of the news being a ‘mini death’ and hostile act, placement often requires a bit of force, persuasion and a ‘firm handshake’ which might sometimes turn into an arm wrestle – never a brawl!
    Always be polite. Have a sense of humour. But also be firm.
    You’re in the process of casting off hundreds of other me-too similar stories that all seem rather similar. But in your case you’re proving yours wins in the Survival of the Fittest Hunger Games.
    The placement with a single journalist can then be followed up, when the story finally breaks in The Guardian, Daily Mail or Sunday Times, with a mass send out to a BCC or personalised Mail-merged list of thousands of journalists who might then pile in with their own versions of the same story – because now it has currency in the form of the story running somewhere else.
    I’ve done this the other way round quite often as well. A general wire out of the story has gone out to a broad list of contacts first, but where seemingly no one is biting.
    In actual fact, no one wanted to be first off the block and were simply waiting and watching who else would go first and break the news.
    As soon as just one outlet ran the story, with a bit of manual prompting and pushing in by me, the entire global media was ablaze writing the same story.
    This is what happened when, during the 40th anniversary year of the Sex Pistols single Anarchy in the UK being released, I said that the son of Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren, the late manager of the Sex Pistols, was going to burn his £5,000,000 punk memorabilia collection in protest about the way that the corporate world had appropriated punk. There was a Virgin Punk credit card. McDonalds had done punk McNuggets.
    So this was widely released first. Single placement second.
    Generally, its single placement first, then wider release second.