HolidayBlogging

Tag: trump

  • Bank of America Reverses Policy That Sparked Debanking of Conservative Religious Groups

    Bank of America Reverses Policy That Sparked Debanking of Conservative Religious Groups

    Bank of America Switches Tactics on Conservative‑Aligned Charities

    What Happened?

    • Policy Overhaul: BofA recently dropped a rule that had been causing banks to pull services from non‑profits tied to conservative religious groups.
    • Widespread Impact: Thousands of charities and churches that had been unfairly cut off are now back in the fold.
    • Why It Matters: The change addresses concerns that the previous rule was too blunt‑instrument, hitting legitimate community work.

    Reactions From the Community

    Many people feel relief that the bank’s actions are now more fair and precise.

    • Talk of Trust: “Finally, we’re not worrying about our accounts getting flagged for nothing,” says a longtime charity manager.
    • Ask for More Guidance: Some members urge BofA to offer clearer guidelines to prevent confusion in the future.
    Looking Ahead

    The bank is committed to ensuring that its policies are transparent and based on real risk, not assumptions. This move marks a step toward better serving all communities, regardless of their ideological leanings.

    Bank of America Tightens the Rules on Account Closures

    In a surprising move that comes straight out of the banking office, BofA decided to pull the plug on a clause that let them shut down an account just because a customer’s religious viewpoint was “unsuitable.” The decision, finalized in late June, aims to make clear that faith—whether it’s prayer or practice—is no reason to send an account off the rails.

    Why the Change Happened

    • Stakeholder feedback: A spectrum of voices—some cheering, some skeptical—told the bank it was time to tighten the script.
    • Political pressure: Conservative activists and politicians have been keeping the bank on their nights out, pointing out that the old rule seemed a bit “politically flavored.”
    • Corporate pride: BofA $offers services to about 120,000 non‑profits that lean on religious roots. “We’re proud of them,” the spokesperson reminded.

    What’s New?

    “Religious views are not a factor in any account closing decision,” the bank clarified. The language has been whittled down so that the only legit reasons to close an account are the usual ones—non‑payment, fraud, or compliance issues.

    Trump vs. The Bank

    Republican heads, notably President Trump, have been shouting about alleged “politically motivated” account terminations. A rumor in the Post claims that Trump’s account was shut down after his first term, supposedly at the behest of the Biden administration following the Jan. 6 chaos.

    Bottom Line

    Bank of America is sounding the alarm that it’s not up for political games. The new Code of Conduct keeps the spotlight on the hard facts, and it insists that faith, like any other personal belief, is a non‑factor in deciding whether an account gets a one‑way ticket.

    Bank of America Finally Gives Up on “Religious Debanking” — Enough is Enough

    What Changed and Why It Matters

    The big news is that Bank of America has finally removed that jab‑taken “viewpoint” clause from its account‑closure playbook. The tweak came after a high‑profile protest led by Jerry Bowyer, a self‑described crusader for religious freedom in finance.

    For years these banks were using a trick called “reputational risk.” Basically, if a client’s beliefs could “ruin” a bank’s shiny image, the bank would close their account. The problem? The line between protecting brand image and slipping into religious discrimination was fuzzy, and it caused headaches for churches, charities and a few other religious groups.

    How the Battle Began

    • In the summer of 2022, Jerry Bowyer noticed that Bank of America was closing an evangelical church’s account in Tennessee.
    • The bank claimed the issue was linked to the church’s partnership with a debt‑collection firm in Uganda. The church insisted that the firm created jobs in a struggling region.
    • Bowyer tried repeatedly to convince the bank to drop the policy that treated religious positions, especially opinions on same‑sex marriage, as hate speech.
    • He kept failing—until the bank finally updated its language in 2023 (after JPMorgan Chase had already done it).

    Bowyer’s “Better late than never” moment came when he finally learned the policy had been reversed. A simple headline, a couple of phone calls, and a new set of guidelines that align with the bank’s own “no political or religious snubbing” stance.

    What the New Language Looks Like

    The bank’s updated policy explicitly says:

    • No more dumping customers just because they hold controversial religious views.
    • It’s now a straight‑forward “no political or religious affiliation” filter, not a vague “not good for our image” filter.
    • It follows a Trump‑era executive order that stopped financial institutions from denying service on loose political or ideological grounds.
    The Ripple Effect

    Some Trump‑aligned businesses—think crypto and other tech sectors—have faced account closures in recent years, proving that politically charged industries can still run into trouble even after policy shifts. This update is a win for folks who believe money should stay neutral toward faith, not a weapon of exclusion.

    Bottom Line

    Bank of America’s overhaul signals that banks are finally tired of the “religious debate” loophole. The move recognizes the difference between protecting a brand and protecting faith—worth celebrating for those who wanted a better balance.

  • Democrats Mobilize Nationwide Protests Against Redistricting

    Democrats Mobilize Nationwide Protests Against Redistricting

    Democrats & Allies Gear Up for Unforgettable Saturday Protest

    What’s the news? The political scene is about to light up on Saturday, August 16th, as Democrats and a bunch of advocacy groups shut down the redistricting rallying bars run by Republicans. They’re not just holding signs—they’re aiming at a plan that, according to them, is a masterstroke to keep the House firmly in GOP hands for years.

    Why the fuss?

    • Reap the legacies. The redrawn districts are said to favor Republican incumbents, squeezing Democratic chances out of swing states.
    • Control the boardroom. With the House largely under GOP influence, debates over key bills could see the usual “yes, we’re ignoring your concerns” routine.
    • Expect a rousing show. Protesters will march, chant, and present their case—punctuating the streets with a dash of theatrical flair.

    Potential Outcomes

    Will this stunt hit the mark? It’s hard to say, but we can guess:

    • Policy Ponder. The Capitol might take a look at the backlash and start a back‑talk about fair boundaries.
    • Voter Vibe. Citizens could feel more seen and heard if the protest grows into a popular movement.
    • Unpredictable Punch. Every political show runs a risk of sparking unintended twists—think unexpected allies, or some behind‑the‑scenes drama.
    In a nutshell

    On Saturday, let’s watch the stage of American politics smile a bit wider as Democrats and their backing crews bold up a march that’s all about fairness. Whether it rewrites the script or just comes down as a memorable splash, only time will tell. Stay tuned, folks—they’re hoping to cherry‑pick a change and serve it straight up on the House’s dessert plate!

    The Great Redistricting Showdown

    Picture this: a comic‑strip style clash where the Democrats are playing a daring game of hide‑and‑seek, while the Republicans are building a giant Lego throne for the next election. The drama’s headline? A “Fight the Trump Takeover” National Day of Action that’s turning the political map from a boring old sheet into a battlefield of rallies and hot‑headed speeches.

    Texas: Where the Democrats Vanish

    • State House drama – Early this month, Texas House Democrats walked out of the chamber to deny a quorum, effectively putting a lid on a GOP proposal to redraw congressional districts.
    • Senate’s 19‑2 vote – The Texas Senate still signed the map on August 12 after the majority of Democrats lay down in a dramatic exit.
    • Five new GOP seats – The new map could hand Republicans five extra seats for the 2026 midterms. That’s a lot of extra power for one party.
    • Abbott’s vow – Gov. Greg Abbott promises to call as many special sessions as needed to push the plan through.
    • Democrat rebuttal – Republicans claim the plan’s legal, while Democrats insist it’s unconstitutional and unfairly targets minority districts.

    California Says, “If You Want Redistricting, We’ll Redistrict”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom isn’t staying on the sidelines. He’s jamming a heartfelt letter to former President Trump, yanking a string from the GOP’s harp by calling the Texas plan a “hyper‑partisan gerrymander” and an “affront to American democracy.” He’s also hinting that California will re‑draw its own lines should the Republicans gain more power. Talk about a game of political chess!

    National League of Democrats and Labor Show

    The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is rolling out the red carpet—well, more like a fight carpet—over the next Saturday. More than 250,000 text messages have been sent to supporters, rallying them for a coastline of nearly 150 rallies across 34 states. Here’s how they’ll shape the fight:

    • “Fight the Trump Takeover” Day – Building a full‑scale mobilization to counter the map change.
    • Independent commissions – A push for transparent, unbiased district drawing.
    • Labor solidarity – A coalition of workers from Texas to Illinois, pledging to defend votes and rights.
    • “This isn’t just a line‑drawing affair; it’s a battle for whose voice the nation hears.” – said by Drucilla Tigner of Texas for All.

    Why This Fight Is About More Than Just A Map

    It’s a wake‑up call that the shape of our districts can turn the fire of democracy into a political furnace. With every roll of the redistricting tool, a slice of the nation’s voice may be molded or flattened. The stakes are high: whether a minority leader’s speak‑up power is preserved or erased can tilt elections in new ways.

    In the end, the National Day of Action is a rally cry for our democracy to keep its balance. If the politicians keep remixing the map to favor one side, the collective voice goes silent. Are you ready to shout back?

  • Commerce Secretary Says Pentagon Weighing Equity Stakes In Defense Contractors

    Commerce Secretary Says Pentagon Weighing Equity Stakes In Defense Contractors

    Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

    The Department of Defense (DOD) is weighing taking equity stakes in defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and others, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on Tuesday.

    Speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Lutnick was asked about whether the Trump administration would attempt to acquire equity stakes in companies, days after the U.S. government acquired 10 percent of Intel stock for around $9.5 billion.

    “Oh, there’s a monstrous discussion about defense,” Lutnick said in response, adding that Lockheed is now “basically an arm of the U.S. government” because it makes most of its revenue through federal contracts.

    “But what’s the economics of that? I’m going to leave that to my secretary of defense and the deputy secretary of defense,“ he said, referring to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his deputy, Steve Feinberg. “These guys are on it and they’re thinking about it.”

    The current situation with defense contractors “has been a giveaway” by the federal government, Lutnick said, adding that the administration is also considering a significant overhaul in the DOD’s appropriations.

    Lockheed Martin manufactures the F-35 Lightning II strike fighter plane, the F-16 Fighting Falcon, the F-22 Raptor, Patriot missiles, the C-130 transport plane, and numerous other assets used by the U.S. military.

    Other major defense contractors include Northrop Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics, and RTX, formerly called Raytheon.

    On Monday, President Donald Trump signaled that he wants the U.S. government to hash out more deals like the one it made with Intel, telling reporters at the White House, “I hope I’m going to have many more cases like it.”

    Trump said in a social media post on Monday that he would help companies that make similar deals with U.S. states, but he did not provide further details.

    The move was not without criticism, including from Republicans. In a post on X, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrote that “if socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn’t the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?”

    “I don’t care if it’s a dollar or a billion-dollar stake,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said in a video interview this week with journalist Major Garrett.

    “That starts feeling like a semi state-owned enterprise a la CCCP,” he said, referring to the acronym for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or USSR in English.

    Lutnick responded to Paul’s concerns on Monday, telling Fox News’ Laura Ingraham that the deal “is not socialism” and would “take care of the American taxpayer.”

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Aug. 22, Intel warned it may receive negative sentiment from investors, employees, and others in response to the U.S. government taking a 10 percent stake in the company.

    “There could be adverse reactions, immediately or over time, from investors, employees, customers, suppliers, other business or commercial partners, foreign governments or competitors,” it stated in the filing. “There may also be litigation related to the transaction or otherwise and increased public or political scrutiny with respect to the Company.”

    Intel also warned that the deal could impact sales overseas.

    “The Company’s non-US business may be adversely impacted by the US Government being a significant stockholder. Sales outside the US accounted for 76 percent of the Company’s revenue for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024,” it said. “Having the US Government as a significant stockholder of the Company could subject the Company to additional regulations, obligations or restrictions, such as foreign subsidy laws or otherwise, in other countries.”

    Loading recommendations…

  • Apple Announces $100B Boost to U.S. Manufacturing

    Apple’s New U.S. Manufacturing Ambitions

    In a move that’s buzzing louder than a MacBook’s fan, Apple is gearing up to pump an eye‑popping $100 billion into U.S. production this coming Wednesday. That’s on top of the previously announced $500 billion pledge, aimed at creating a new high‑tech hub in Houston, boosting Apple TV+ in twenty states, and collaborating with domestic suppliers.

    What’s Inside the $500 billion Blueprint?

    • Houston‑Based Powerhouse: A cutting‑edge factory to churn out servers that power Apple Intelligence.
    • Apple TV+ Expansion: Fresh shows shot in twenty U.S. states, adding local flair to the streaming lineup.
    • Supplier Synergy: Partnerships with U.S. manufacturers to keep the supply chain home‑grown.

    Why the U.S. Focus? The Trump Twist!

    President Trump has been sounding the Trumpet of tariffs, threatening to slap hell‑on‑high taxes onto Apple unless the tech titan moves more of its production from the jungles of Asia to the good ol’ U.S. Of course, Apple’s phones are mostly born in India, China, and Vietnam. Though these locations have been hit by tariffs, the company already felt the pinch—$800 million in extra costs were reported in June, with an expectation of another $1.1 billion next quarter, according to CEO Tim Cook on a recent earnings call.

    Apple’s Response: “We’re Going One‑Step Closer to Home.”

    With more cash set aside, Apple looks poised to answer Trump’s call, turning honey‑combed factories over to the front yard. The company’s optimism keeps it humming: if it’s so happy while dropping big bucks for American-made parts, maybe we’ll see a new line of “Made in U.S.” iPhones dropping into the next Gen‑Gal’s hands.

  • A timeline of the US semiconductor market in 2025

    A timeline of the US semiconductor market in 2025

    It’s been a tumultuous year for the U.S. semiconductor industry.

    The semiconductor industry plays a sizable role in the “AI race” that the U.S. seems determined to win, which is why this context is worth paying attention to: from Intel’s appointment of Lip-Bu Tan to CEO — who wasted no time getting to work trying to revitalize the legacy company — to Joe Biden proposing sweeping new AI chip export rules on his way out of office that never came to fruition.

    Here’s a look at what’s happened so far in 2025.

    August

    Nvidia reports record quarter

    August 27: The turmoil in the semiconductor market this year has clearly not hurt Nvidia. On August 27, the company reported that it had record sales in the second quarter. The highlights were the growth of its data center business, which saw its revenue grow 56% year over year.

    U.S. Government takes equity stake in Intel

    August 22: The U.S. government announced it was converting existing government grants into a 10% stake in Intel. The deal was structured to penalize Intel if the company’s ownership in its foundry program dropped below 50%.

    SoftBank takes a stake in Intel

    August 18: Japanese conglomerate SoftBank announced it was taking a $2 billion stake in Intel. SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son called the deal “strategic.” The transaction was announced as rumors were swirling that the U.S. was going to take a stake in the company.

    Chip companies strike a deal to sell in China

    August 12: Nvidia and AMD announced that they struck a deal with the U.S. government to gain the necessary license to sell their AI chips in China. Both companies agreed to pay the U.S. government 15% of revenue from their chip sales in China.

    Techcrunch event

    Join 10k+ tech and VC leaders for growth and connections at Disrupt 2025

    Netflix, Box, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just some of the 250+ heavy hitters leading 200+ sessions designed to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech. Grab your ticket before Sept 26 to save up to $668.

    Join 10k+ tech and VC leaders for growth and connections at Disrupt 2025

    Netflix, Box, a16z, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just some of the 250+ heavy hitters leading 200+ sessions designed to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech. Grab your ticket before Sept 26 to save up to $668.

    San Francisco
    |
    October 27-29, 2025

    REGISTER NOW

    Trump and Lip-Bu Tan meet

    August 11: Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan went to the White House to meet with President Donald Trump. The pair talked about Tan’s past and how Intel can help the U.S. with its goal of bringing semiconductor manufacturing back to the U.S. Both called the conversation productive.

    Trump comes for Lip-Bu Tan

    August 7: President Donald Trump demanded that Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan “resign immediately” due to “conflicts of interest” in a Truth Social post. While Trump didn’t clarify what the conflicts of interest were, this came the day after Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel’s board of directors inquiring about Tan’s ties to China.

    Trump says tariffs are coming for the industry

    August 5: President Donald Trump told CNBC’s Squawk Box that he was planning to announce tariffs on the semiconductor industry as soon as the following week. At the time, he didn’t mention specifics on what these tariffs could look like. As of September 5, no tariffs have been announced for this industry.

    July

    Intel spins out business unit

    July 25: Just one day after its second-quarter earnings call, Intel confirmed that it was spinning out its Network and Edge group, which is responsible for making chips for the telecom industry. The business unit produced $5.8 billion in revenue for the semiconductor company in 2024.

    Intel continues to look for efficiency

    July 24: Intel announced that it was pulling back on some of its manufacturing operations. The company will no longer pursue its previously announced projects in Germany and Poland and is consolidating its test operations. Intel also announced it plans to end this year with around 75,000 employees.

    Trump’s AI Action Plan

    July 23: The Trump administration unveiled its much-anticipated AI Action Plan alongside multiple related executive orders. While the plan includes a lot regarding the need for U.S. chip export controls and for the U.S. to coordinate with its allies on this effort, it doesn’t provide any concrete information on what these restrictions would look like.

    Groundbreaking UAE AI deal reportedly on hold

    July 17: The Trump administration helped foster a groundbreaking deal in May that resulted in a commitment from the United Arab Emirates to buy billions of dollars’ worth of AI chips from Nvidia. But now that deal is reportedly on hold as the U.S. works through national security concerns and fears that those chips could be smuggled from the Middle East to China.

    Nvidia is a bargaining chip

    July 16: A day after semiconductor firms like Nvidia and AMD got the green light to resume selling certain AI chips to China, we found out why. U.S. Commerce Security Howard Lutnick said the plans to allow U.S. companies to start selling AI chips in China are tied to ongoing trade discussions between the U.S. and China regarding rare earth elements.

    U.S. chips head back to China

    July 14: Nvidia said it was filing an application to restart sales of H20 AI chips in China, confirming rumors from a few weeks prior. The company also announced that it would be selling a new chip, the RTX Pro, which was designed specifically for the Chinese market.

    Malaysia fights chip smuggling

    July 14: Malaysia announced that it was launching trade permits for U.S.-made AI chips. Under this new restriction, any individual or business would need to give the Malaysian government 30 days’ notice before exporting any U.S. AI chips.

    June

    Intel appoints new leadership

    June 18: Intel announced four new leadership appointments that Intel says will help it move toward its goal of becoming an engineering-first company again. Intel announced a new chief revenue officer in addition to multiple high-profile engineering hires.

    Intel to begin layoffs

    June 17: Intel will begin to lay off a significant chunk of its Intel Foundry staff in July. The company plans to eliminate at least 15%, and up to 20%, of workers in that business unit. These layoffs aren’t a shock: It was rumored back in April, and Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan has said he wants to flatten the organization.

    Nvidia won’t report on China

    June 13: Nvidia isn’t counting on the U.S. backing off from its AI chip export restrictions anytime soon. After the company took a financial hit from the newly imposed licensing requirements on its H20 AI chips, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the company will no longer include the Chinese market in future revenue and profit forecasts.

    AMD acquires the team behind Untether AI

    June 6: AMD makes another acquisition — this time focused on talent. The company acqui-hired the team behind Untether AI, which develops AI inference chips, as the semiconductor giant continues to round out its AI offerings.

    AMD is coming for Nvidia’s AI hardware dominance

    June 4: AMD continued its shopping spree. The company acquired AI software optimization startup Brium, which helps companies retrofit AI software to work with different AI hardware. With a lot of AI software being designed with Nvidia hardware in mind, this acquisition isn’t surprising.

    May

    Nvidia lays out the impact of chip export restrictions

    May 28: Nvidia reported that U.S. licensing requirements on its H20 AI chips cost the company $4.5 billion in charges during Q1. The company expects these requirements to result in an $8 billion hit to Nvidia’s revenue in Q2.

    AMD acquires Enosemi

    May 28: AMD kicks off its acquisition spree. The semiconductor company announced that it acquired Enosemi, a silicon photonics startup. Enosemi’s tech, which uses light photons to transmit data, is becoming an increasing area of interest for semiconductor companies.

    Tensions start to flare between China and the U.S.

    May 21: China’s Commerce Secretary didn’t like the U.S. guidance, issued on May 13, that warned U.S. companies that using Huawei’s AI chips “anywhere in the world” was a U.S. chip export violation. The commerce secretary issued a statement that threatened legal action against anyone caught enforcing that export restriction.

    Intel may be starting to offload its non-core units

    May 20: Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan seemingly got right to work on his plan to spin out Intel’s non-core business units. The semiconductor giant is reportedly looking to offload its Networking and Edge units, which make chips for telecom equipment, and were responsible for $5.4 billion of the company’s 2024 revenue.

    The Biden administration’s AI Diffusion rule is officially dead

    May 13: Just days before the Biden administration’s Artificial Intelligence Diffusion Rule was set to go into place, the U.S. Department of Commerce formally rescinded it. The DOC said that it plans to issue new guidance in the future, and in the meantime, companies should remember that using Huawei’s Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world is a violation of U.S. export rules.

    A last-minute reversal

    May 7: Just a week before the “Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion” was set to go into place, the Trump administration plans on taking a different path. According to multiple media outlets, including Axios and Bloomberg, the administration won’t enforce the restrictions when they were supposed to start on May 15 and is instead working on its own framework. 

    April

    Anthropic doubles down on its support of chip export restrictions

    April 30: Anthropic doubled down on its support for restricting U.S.-made chip exports, including some tweaks to the Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion, like imposing further restrictions on Tier 2 countries and dedicating resources to enforcement. An Nvidia spokesperson shot back, saying, “American firms should focus on innovation and rise to the challenge, rather than tell tall tales that large, heavy, and sensitive electronics are somehow smuggled in ‘baby bumps’ or ‘alongside live lobsters.’” 

    Planned layoffs at Intel

    April 22: Ahead of its Q1 earnings call, Intel said it was planning to lay off more than 21,000 employees. The layoffs were meant to streamline management, something CEO Lip-Bu Tan has long said Intel needed to do, and help rebuild the company’s engineering focus. 

    The Trump administration further restricts chip exports

    April 15: Nvidia’s H20 AI chip got hit with an export licensing requirement, the company disclosed in an SEC filing. The company added it expects $5.5 billion in charges related to this new requirement in the first quarter of its 2026 fiscal year. The H20 is the most advanced AI chip Nvidia can still export to China in some form or fashion. TSMC and Intel reported similar expenses the same week. 

    Nvidia appears to talk its way out of further chip exports

    April 9: Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang was spotted attending dinner at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, according to reports. At the time, NPR reported Huang may have been able to spare Nvidia’s H20 AI chips from export restrictions upon agreeing to invest in AI data centers in the U.S. 

    An alleged agreement between Intel and TSMC

    April 3: Intel and TSMC allegedly reached a tentative agreement to launch a joint chipmaking venture. This joint venture would operate Intel’s chipmaking facilities, and TSMC would have a 20% stake in the new venture. Both companies declined to comment or confirm. If this deal doesn’t come to fruition, this is likely a decent preview of potential deals in this industry to come. 

    Intel spins off non-core assets, announces new initiative

    April 1: CEO Lip-Bu Tan got to work right away. Just weeks after he joined Intel, the company announced that it was going to spin off non-core assets so it could focus. He also said the company would launch new products, including custom semiconductors for customers. 

    March

    Intel names a new CEO 

    March 12:  Intel announced that industry veteran and former board member Lip-Bu Tan would return to the company as CEO on March 18. At the time of his appointment, Tan said Intel would be an “engineering-focused company” under his leadership. 

    February

    Intel’s Ohio chip plant gets delayed again

    February 28: Intel was supposed to start operating its first chip fabrication plant in Ohio this year. Instead, the company slowed down construction on the plant for the second time in February. Now the $28 billion semiconductor project won’t wrap up construction until 2030 and may not even open until 2031.

    Senators call for more chip export restrictions

    February 3: U.S. senators, including Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo), wrote a letter to Commerce Secretary Nominee-Designate Howard Lutnick, urging the Trump administration to further restrict AI chip exports. The letter specifically referred to Nvidia’s H20 AI chips, which were used in the training of DeepSeek’s R1 “reasoning” model. 

    January 

    DeepSeek releases its open “reasoning” model

    January 27: Chinese AI startup DeepSeek caused quite the stir in Silicon Valley when it released the open version of its R1 “reasoning” model. While this isn’t semiconductor news specifically, the sheer alarm in the AI and semiconductor industries DeepSeek’s release caused continues to have ripple effects on the chip industry. 

    Joe Biden’s executive order on chip exports

    January 13: With just a week left in office, former president Joe Biden proposed sweeping new export restrictions on U.S.-made AI chips. This order created a three-tier structure that determined how many U.S. chips can be exported to each country. Under this proposal, Tier 1 countries faced no restrictions; Tier 2 countries had a chip purchase limit for the first time; and Tier 3 countries got additional restrictions. 

    Anthropic’s Dario Amodei weighs in on chip export restrictions

    January 6: Anthropic co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei co-wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal endorsing existing AI chip export controls and pointing to them as a reason why China’s AI market was behind the U.S. He also called on incoming president Donald Trump to impose further restrictions and to close loopholes that have allowed AI companies in China to still get their hands on these chips.

    This story was originally published on May 9, 2025, and is regularly updated with new information.

  • UK Agrees To Drop Demand For Apple To Create Backdoor Access: Gabbard

    UK Agrees To Drop Demand For Apple To Create Backdoor Access: Gabbard

    Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,

    The UK government has agreed to drop its request that Apple provide it with backdoor access to user data, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Monday.

    Gabbard stated on X that the agreement came after months of working with UK partners, alongside President Donald Trump, and Vice President JD Vance, to ensure Americans’ private data and civil liberties are protected

    “As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a ‘back door’ that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties,” she said.

    Earlier this year, reports emerged that the UK government had issued Apple a “technical capability notice,” requiring the company to provide access to encrypted user data under the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016. In response, Apple halted its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature for users in the UK, citing concerns over data breaches.

    The iPhone maker stated in a Feb. 24 blog post that it has “never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will.”

    The ADP feature provides end-to-end encryption for iCloud storage, preventing non-account holders—including governments and hackers—from accessing data such as photos, documents, and notes. Without ADP, certain types of iCloud data will no longer be fully encrypted, making it potentially accessible to third parties with the proper legal authority.

    “Apple remains committed to offering our users the highest level of security for their personal data and we are hopeful that we will be able to do so in the future in the United Kingdom,” Apple stated at the time.

    In May, U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan and U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Brian Mast sent a letter to UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, urging her to allow Apple to disclose the order’s existence to the U.S. Department of Justice so the department can assess whether the order complies with a U.S.-UK bilateral agreement under the CLOUD Act, which prohibits orders requiring companies to decrypt data.

    According to the letter, U.S. companies are prohibited under UK laws to disclose or confirm the existence of such an order, and doing so constitutes a criminal offense, even if the disclosure is made to the company’s home government.

    The U.S. lawmakers warned that the UK’s order for Apple to create a backdoor could lead to some implications, as it might be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian regimes.

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard speaks to reporters during a briefing at the White House in Washington on July 23, 2025. Travis Gillmore/The Epoch Times

    “These vulnerabilities would not only affect UK users but also American citizens and others worldwide, given the global nature of Apple’s services,” they stated in the letter.

    The UK’s Home Office and Apple did not return requests for comment by publication time.

    Loading recommendations…
  • "We Know The Names": After Another [REDACTED] Epstein Release, Victims Vow To Produce Their Own List

    "We Know The Names": After Another [REDACTED] Epstein Release, Victims Vow To Produce Their Own List

    On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee released a massive dump of ‘Epstein files’ – only for most of them to be highly redacted, providing little to no additional insight into who Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile clients were. 

    Massie ‘Demands Accountability’

    On Wendesday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) held a press conference outside the Capitol along with some of Epstein’s accusers, where he called on at least two more Republican Reps to sign onto a bipartisan discharge petition that will allow him to bypass leadership and force a vote on the release of the Epstein files. 

    “We demand real accountability,” Massie said. “I encourage my colleagues … there’s over 200 Republicans who have not signed this discharge petition. We only need two of them to sign it.”

    So far, just four Republicans have signed on to the petition; Massie, and Reps. Nancy Mace, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Bobert. 

    The White House, meanwhile, says that any Republicans helping Massie would be engaging int a ‘hostile act’

    Victims Vow To Release Own List

    During the press conference, model Lisa Phillips – who was introduced to Epstein in the early 2000s, said that she and other survivors of the Epstein-Maxwell sex-trafficking network are going to release their own list of abusers. 

    Lisa Phillips says survivors of Epstein’s abuse have been discussing creating their own list of influential associates.

    “We know the names,” said Phillips. “Many of us were abused by them.”

    “Now, together, as survivors, we will confidentially compile the names we all know who were regularly in the Epstein world. And it will be done by survivors and for survivors — no one else is involved.” 

    Phillips was joined by nearly a dozen other victims or family members of victims who were involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s network to urge Congress to pass the discharge petition. 

    Watch the entire press conference below:

     

    Loading recommendations…