The Velvet Sundown: A Tale of Fake AI and Spotify’s Sneaky Side
Picture this: a hard‑rock band that claims its music is churned out by machines, yet in reality, it’s all humans. That’s the wild story of The Velvet Sundown, a band that leveraged a face‑hugging “AI” narrative to get headlines, fans, and—shockingly—a chance to dodge the usual royalties that Spotify should’ve been paying them. The saga didn’t just prank everyone; it also blew a lid off what many suspected was Spotify’s secret, royalty‑free playbook.
The Fantasy of AI‑Generated Rock
- In 2023, The Velvet Sundown hit the internet with a slick video explaining how their “AI‑driven” guitar riffs were born from neural networks.
- Fans were hyped, skeptics were laughing, and marketing teams were scrambling to build buzz around the supposed technological breakthrough.
- All of it was an elaborate ruse—humans wrote the songs, but the band staged the AI claim as a marketing gimmick.
Why Pretend to Be AI?
Because it’s money, baby. The band’s marketing was borrowing the very buzz that would normally come with pioneering AI tech. They used the “AI” angle to:
- Generate viral attention from media outlets craving the newest tech story.
- Gain free licensing from platforms that often lower royalty costs for so‑called “AI content.”
- Boost stream numbers on Spotify by riding the wave of the generative AI hype.
Spotify’s Suspected Playbook (or how they tried to keep the cash flowing)
Spotify, the digital music giant, has long faced criticism for its royalty payments—some say royalties are too low for artists. The Velvet Sundown case highlights how the company might have been capitalizing on collective confusion:
- ＜Claimed AI technology＞ could be exempt from standard royalty floors.
- ＜Limited reporting＞ on whether the tracks were truly machine‑generated or human‑crafted.
- ＜Exploiting loopholes＞ that let indie groups like The Velvet Sundown slip under the radar and play millions of streams without paying the due digital fees.
Why Generative AI Feels So Dangerous
When the line between real and AI-generated content blurs, it turns the entire consumer‑rights and royalty‑payment ecosystem into a muddle. spotify’s blissful ignorance?
- Artwork and licensing becomes responsibly ambiguous.
- Artists lose control over their royalties at the click of a button.
- It underlines public fear: “So who can trust the love‑fest of AI?”
The Takeaway for Fans, Artists, and Tech‑Too‑Trust‑Non‑No‑One
What does this mean for the music scene?
- Artists should be extra cautious of how they frame their creative processes.
- Fans should demand transparency about who’s behind the tracks.
- The tech industry needs a solid legal framework to avoid “AI” being a loophole for underpayment.
In sum, The Velvet Sundown’s faux‑AI tricks might seem a marketing stunt, but it opened Pandora’s box for piracy, royalty scuttling, and a chorus of skepticism. The fallout urges Spotify, and every streaming service, to tighten the reins on AI claims and ensure artists truly get the penny (and half‑penny) they deserve.
Who’s the New Sonic Sensation on Spotify?
Ever stumbled upon a band that’s suddenly the talk of the town? The Velvet Sundown is doing just that—amassing over a million monthly listeners in less than two months. Talk about a meteoric launch!
Two Albums, One Outrageous Group
- Floating On Echoes – dropped 5th June
- Dust And Silence – dropped 20th June
That’s two whole albums before anyone even knows they’re a thing! The quartet’s psych-rock stylings currently live under the “Verified Artist” badge, a badge reserved for greats.
Next Up: “Paper Sun Rebellion”
New tunes are on the horizon. Their cinematic alt‑pop and dreamy analogue soul collection is set to hit the airwaves on 14 July.
Band Members—Because Names Matter
- Gabe Farrow – “mellotron sorcerer” and the voice behind the melody
- Lennie West – the guitar wizard whose riffs feel like a dynamic wind
- Milo Rains – the “bassist‑synth alchemist” who turns basslines into sonic gold
- Orion “Rio” Del Mar – the free‑spirited percussionist who throws beats like confetti
One might imagine the crew gasping at their sudden popularity, but—spoiler alert—they’re not human folks at all. The Velvet Sundown is a fictional concept band that has somehow turned a viral trend into an actual music sensation. How’s that for a twist?
What fresh hell is this?
Is The Velvet Sundown Just a Faked‑In‑a‑Jail Song Machine?
Picture this: you open your Discover Weekly, expect a mix of new hits, and suddenly—bam!—every track on your list is a brand‑new tune from The Velvet Sundown. Curious? You Google it. What pops up? A whirlwind of questions. Is the band legit? Did someone actually write those lyrics? Quick sanity check: the songs sound… a tad bland, and the lines “Boots in the mud, sky burning red … Radio hums while the silence screams” read like a grocery list for a sleepy summer night.
Reddit Gets Stumped
Reddit users started digging into the background, and the band’s Instagram account—launched late June—quickly raised another set of eyebrows. The photos are drenched in a yellow hue, and the band members pose like “trust‑fund kids who refuse to work for their dad’s company.” That’s not music franchising; that’s a “cookie‑cutter hipster” vibe that’s borderline creative refuse.
Spotify’s “Verified Artist” Bong‑Bong
On Spotify, the band’s bio reads:
“There’s something quietly spellbinding about The Velvet Sundown. You don’t just listen to them, you drift into them. Their music doesn’t shout for your attention; it seeps in slowly, like a scent that suddenly takes you back somewhere you didn’t expect.”
Sounded pretty dramatic, right? But if you’re getting melancholy folding back in your spleen—thinking maybe you’re too sensitive—just remember that’s not the vibe The Velvet Sundown wants for themselves.
Defense on X: “The Real Band Not The AI Band”
Facing a wave of critics, the band responded on their X account with the tag Velvet Sundown – The Real Band Not The AI Band:
- “Absolutely crazy that so‑called ‘journalists’ keep pushing the lazy, baseless theory that The Velvet Sundown is ‘AI‑generated’ with zero evidence.”
- “Not a single one of these ‘writers’ has reached out, visited a show, or listened beyond the Spotify algorithm.”
They doubled down: “This is not a joke. This is our music, written in long, sweaty nights in a cramped bungalow in California with real instruments, real minds, and real soul. Every chord, every lyric, every mistake – HUMAN.”
What X Says on Their Bio
“Just A Bunch of Very Real Dudes In A Totally Real Band Keeping It Extremely Real! No, We Never Use AI!”
Is the over‑performance the problem? Or is it the hints that AI was involved? The jury’s still handing out verdicts.
Spotify’s Silent Stance
Spotify, which happily accepts AI‑generated music without disclosure, didn’t answer any comment requests. Meanwhile, a rival platform, Deezer, didn’t wait long to flag the band’s album Dust And Silence as “100% generated by AI.”
Deezer’s press release was clear:
“In order to protect artists’ remuneration and guarantee an optimal user experience, Deezer currently excludes 100% AI tracks from its algorithmic and editorial recommendations.”
They also dropped a scary stat: nearly 20% of music uploaded to their platform is artificial. That’s nearly double the amount in just three months. Predictable, right? The problem’s only going to grow.
In Summary
- Reddit & Spotify flags raise eyebrows.
- The band screams “real,” but evidence seems shaky.
- Deezer calls out AI, hinting at a future where music may be a ghost‑writer’s playground.
So next time a playlist flips, ask yourself: is that Velvet Sundown truly laying down some guitars or just plugging in a pre‑synthesised dream? Keep those headphones on, because the line between real & synthetic is getting blurrier—and a lot more humor is required.
Then, the “Extremely Real” jig was up
The Velvet Sundown: A New Twist in the Music World
Swedish
Proverb meets modern tech: “What’s hidden in the snow will surface when it thaws.”
That’s the vibe the band’s fresh Spotify bio is shouting out loud.
Full‑Scale Confession
First, the big reveal: The Velvet Sundown is a synthetic music project that’s guided by human imagination, but the heavy lifting—writing, producing, even sounding like a genuine artist—is all AI‑powered.
They’ve dropped the “listening event” and gone straight to the heart‑to‑heart honesty:
“This isn’t a trick – it’s a mirror. An ongoing artistic provocation designed to challenge the boundaries of authorship, identity, and the future of music itself in the age of AI.”
What Exactly Was Generated?
- Characters and stories
- Music tracks–including those haunting synth lines and dreamy vocal loops
- Voices that sound strikingly human
- Lyrics that flow like emotions, all crafted by AI tools
They add a cautious note: “Any resemblance to actual places, events or persons – living or deceased – is purely coincidental and unintentional.” So while you might recognize a vibe from a real world setting, it’s more of a creative coincidence.
Where Do They Stumble?
They wrap it up with a subtle philosophical note: “Not quite human. Not quite machine. The Velvet Sundown lives somewhere in between.”
And a quick heads‑up from their X (formerly Twitter) post: “They said we weren’t real. Maybe you’re not real either.” – because if even the band’s truth can be a bit fuzzy, who’s to say real isn’t a bit fuzzy?
The Big Takeaway
What’s happening? The band is blasting the boundaries of what it means to create art. Their tale is a flirtation with the idea that AI and humans can co‑author stories that feel almost autobiographical, yet come from a machine. It’s a conversation about authenticity, creativity, and the new digital age.
So next time you press play on a Velvet Sundown track, remember: the melody might be computer‑born, but the feelings are human‑like, and that’s the future.
No laughing matter
AI is Surfing the Music Scene – And Not All Waves are Safe
What started as a cool Insta‑post by The Velvet Sundown ended up sounding like a manifesto on how we might ditch the soul of creativity for a quick, AI‑generated hit.
The “Easy‑Fix” of Gone‑Wrong Artistry
- Picture this: a band telling us “let’s skip the hard part of making music and just slap on some AI tracks.”
- In other words, ditch the emotional grind, go straight to the pay‑check.
- Nick Cave himself has taken the AI on a “grail of ghosts.” He’s calling out the industry’s new shortcut.
Ghost Artists, Real Pain – Spotify’s Big Move
- Last December, a spoiler in Harper’s Magazine claimed Spotify is embedding “phantom artists”—basically AI‑brewed copies—to cut royalty payouts.
- Liz Pelly’s book Mood Machine dives into how Spotify smuggles these faux acts into playlists mainstream audiences love.
- With Spotify’s “optimization”, the real craftspeople get a smaller slice of the pie, while the platform keeps cash flowing.
Hard Numbers, Harder Reality
Studies Thursday showed the potential impact:
- Without a policy intervention, artists might lose over 20 % of their income to AI‑generated tracks in the next four years.
- In contrast, AI developers could see a surge from €0.1 bn in 2023 to a whopping €4 bn by 2028.
- These figures come from a global economic study done by the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), the first to spotlight AI’s touch on human creativity.
Artists Throwing Their Voices in the Air
- From the legendary Nick Cave to the iconic Paul McCartney, the line‑up doesn’t stop – Elton John, Radiohead, Dua Lipa, Kate Bush, Robbie Williams… all shouting for a UK copyright overhaul.
- They’re demanding that laws step in to protect creators from a future where a computer can string chords faster than a human hand.
- So far, buttion still finds the industry’s “AI wages” shadows.
In short: The AI wave might look thrilling, but it’s a storm that could drown the beat of those who’ve spent a lifetime perfecting their craft. Let’s keep the soundtrack human.
Parting words to the band and its overlords
From a “so‑called journalist” to the Velvet Sundown and Spotify
Imagine a band that thinks a deck of algorithmic chips can beat a real song. Eureka? Nope—unless you’re a tech bro chasing high‑flying profits.
The Big Picture
This synthetic music project seems less like art and more like a cash‑cow. It’s the reminder that reality‑check can be lost when tech bros convert the music “creative process” into a line of code.
Spotify: The Spin Doctor
Daniel Ek claimed Spotify doesn’t download, create, or upload content—AI or otherwise.
But the listening surface still harbors “AI‑music” feeds, just to swirl money back into the tech jugular.
Why This Feels Out of Touch
- Listeners fret over the swaddling blanket of AI‑generated songs.
- Artists say their craft shouldn’t be reduced to algorithmic beat‑hubs.
- Dramas happen when tech overlords feel out of tune with the rhythm of human concerns.
What the Solution Looks Like
Transparency is the key: disclose when tracks are born from code so fans can weigh whether the vibe suits them.
The Velvet Sundown’s Shortcoming
The experiment only shows that where there’s music there can be no evil turns out to be a myth—especially if that music is churned out by an algorithm with no emotions.
Spotify’s Response
“We don’t get a purse‑string that rewards tracks made by AI tools. Every song on our platform is created, owned, and uploaded by licensed third parties,” the company says.
Final Take
Want to keep your ears honest and your head actually listening? Demand real, human‑crafted music. After all, richer music means fewer rickety AI‑generated beats hunting for your playlist.